2014
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degree of conversion of resin‐based materials cured with dual‐peak or single‐peak LED light‐curing units

Abstract: Dual-peak LED LCUs may not be best suited for curing non-Lucirin(®) TPO-containing materials. A clear sealant showed a better cure throughout the material and may be more appropriate than opaque versions in deep fissures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Time‐saving procedures are an ongoing demand for restorative applications, especially for non‐cooperative patients, recently; significant improvements have been made in LED dental curing unit technology to allow for shorter clinical application times. Although the curing efficiency of new‐generation LED LCUs has been generally investigated for composite resins, there is little information available about their performance with other resin‐containing restorative materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time‐saving procedures are an ongoing demand for restorative applications, especially for non‐cooperative patients, recently; significant improvements have been made in LED dental curing unit technology to allow for shorter clinical application times. Although the curing efficiency of new‐generation LED LCUs has been generally investigated for composite resins, there is little information available about their performance with other resin‐containing restorative materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra were processed with FORAM PC‐software. The DC calculations were performed by comparing the relative change of the band at 1640 cm −1 , representing the C = C stretch to the aromatic C = C reference band peak height at 1610 cm −1 , which remained unchanged during the reaction as described in the following equation: normalDnormalC %=|1 normalcnormalunormalrnormalenormald |normalpnormalenormalanormalk normalhnormalenormalinormalgnormalhnormalt normalunormalnnormaldnormalenormalr 1640/normalpnormalenormalanormalk normalhnormalenormalinormalgnormalhnormalt normalunormalnnormaldnormalenormalr 1610normalunormalnnormalcnormalunormalrnormalenormald true(normalpnormalenormalanormalk normalhnormalenormalinormalgnormalhnormalt normalunormalnnormaldnormalenormalr 1640/normalpnormalenormalanormalk normalhnormalenormalinormalgnormalhnormalt normalunormalnnormaldnormalenormalr 1610true)× 100 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photochemically, since shorter wavelength photons have more energy, it was suggested that photons will not be absorbed by the chemical initiators which do not exactly match the absorption spectrum and will be scattered (27,28). In a study by Lucey et al (29) where they evaluated the effect of second-and third-generation LED light sources on the degree of conversion (DC) of various restorative materials, best DC values were obtained when the composite was polymerized with the second-generation LED light source using camphorquinone as the photoinitiator. Shimokawa et al (30) In contrast to those studies, no significant difference was noted between the monowave and polywave LED light curing units (Elipar S10 and Bluephase G2) in the degree of conversion of different bulk fill composites (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%