2007
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2006.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of Two Commercial Anionic Surfactants by Means of Ozone and/or UV Irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is to the contrary of the previous results for ozonization of SDS where adding hydrogen peroxide influenced SDS degradation. 26 However, the most significant difference between those results and our work is pH. After first passing through the DBD reactor, pH decreased from starting pH 7 to 3.5 in the case of SDS.…”
Section: Influence Of Homogenous Catalystscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…This is to the contrary of the previous results for ozonization of SDS where adding hydrogen peroxide influenced SDS degradation. 26 However, the most significant difference between those results and our work is pH. After first passing through the DBD reactor, pH decreased from starting pH 7 to 3.5 in the case of SDS.…”
Section: Influence Of Homogenous Catalystscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Repeated measurements of particle diameters for these two latices gave the same results. Contrary to gamma rays, UV light does not degrade SDS by itself but only in the presence of ozone as used for water pollution remediation 51. Thus, the loss of surfactant cannot be the reason for explaining this irregular behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Advanced oxidation processes have been investigated previously for surfactant wastewater treatment using Fenton oxidation (Lin et al 1999;Bandala et al 2008); electrochemical oxidation (Gu et al 2006), ozone and/or UV irradiation (Amat et al 2007) and Beltran and co-workers (2000) have also reported the kinetics of decomposition of DBS with ozone, but most of these studies have concentrated on the kinetics of removal of the surfactant rather than the decrease in total organic carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%