2019
DOI: 10.1101/676965
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 with an EED-targeted Bivalent Chemical Degrader

Abstract: Protein degradation via the use of bivalent chemical degraders provides an alternative strategy to block protein function and assess the biological roles of putative drug targets. This approach capitalizes on the advantages of small molecule inhibitors while moving beyond the restrictions of traditional pharmacology. Herein we report a first-in-class chemical degrader (UNC6852) that targets Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). UNC6852 contains an EED226 derived ligand and a ligand for VHL which bind to the WD… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first example of an EZH2 degrader employed the hydrophobic tagging approach, which induces local protein unfolding to enact protein degradation [238] . Subsequently, Potjewyd and co‐workers reported a PROTAC that binds the embryonic ectoderm development (EED) unit in PRC2 and induces proteasomal degradation of EED, EZH2, and SUZ12 in human cells bearing EZH2‐activating mutations [236] . This degradation of multiple PRC subunits was also observed in an independent approach employed by Hsu and co‐workers [235] .…”
Section: Lysine Post‐translational Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The first example of an EZH2 degrader employed the hydrophobic tagging approach, which induces local protein unfolding to enact protein degradation [238] . Subsequently, Potjewyd and co‐workers reported a PROTAC that binds the embryonic ectoderm development (EED) unit in PRC2 and induces proteasomal degradation of EED, EZH2, and SUZ12 in human cells bearing EZH2‐activating mutations [236] . This degradation of multiple PRC subunits was also observed in an independent approach employed by Hsu and co‐workers [235] .…”
Section: Lysine Post‐translational Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…35). 306 UNC6852 potently degraded EED and EZH2 with DC 50 values of 0.79 ± 0.14 μM and 0.3 ± 0.19 μM, respectively, while SUZ12 showed less degradation. In addition, UNC6852 blocked the histone methyltransferase activity of EZH2 and inhibited the proliferation of DB cells (a DLBCL cell line harboring the EZH2 Y641N mutant) with an EC 50 of 3.4 ± 0.77 μΜ after 9 days of treatment, which was similar to the inhibitors EED226 and UNC1999…”
Section: Prc2 (Eed-targeted)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…80% degradation). This compound also degraded EZH2 and had antiproliferative effects [214]. Two other PROTACs were found to degrade EED, EZH2 and SUZ12 in the PRC2 complex [213].…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In 2020, PROTACs targeting the EED subunit of PRC2 were developed [213,214]. These could solve the problem of resistance to EZH1/2 inhibitors (tazemetostat) that had been addressed by using allosteric EED inhibitors.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%