2021
DOI: 10.3390/app112210653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of Mechanical Behavior of Sandstone under Freeze-Thaw Conditions with Different Low Temperatures

Abstract: This study investigated the effects of freezing temperature under freeze-thaw cycling conditions on the mechanical behavior of sandstone. First, the sandstone specimens were subjected to 10-time freeze-thaw cycling treatments at different freezing temperatures (−20, −40, −50, and −60 °C). Subsequently, a series of density, ultrasonic wave, and static and dynamic mechanical behavior tests were carried out. Finally, the effects of freezing temperature on the density, P-wave velocity, stress–strain curves, static… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DCS of rocks was determined using Hopkinson separated compression rods, with confining pressure gradients of 0, 2, 5, and 10 MPa, and an impact pressure range of 0.2 to 0.6 MPa. This paper conducted intelligent prediction research based on ten influencing factors affecting the DCS of rocks under freeze-thaw cycles [28,[47][48][49][50][51] , including FTC, CP, IP, DD, NWC, WA, ADW, P, PWV, and SR. After thorough investigation, this study amassed a total of 216 sets of data for the training and testing sets. The ratio between the training and testing sets was established at 8:2, with the initial 173 groups designated as training samples and the final 43 groups allocated for testing.…”
Section: Raw Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCS of rocks was determined using Hopkinson separated compression rods, with confining pressure gradients of 0, 2, 5, and 10 MPa, and an impact pressure range of 0.2 to 0.6 MPa. This paper conducted intelligent prediction research based on ten influencing factors affecting the DCS of rocks under freeze-thaw cycles [28,[47][48][49][50][51] , including FTC, CP, IP, DD, NWC, WA, ADW, P, PWV, and SR. After thorough investigation, this study amassed a total of 216 sets of data for the training and testing sets. The ratio between the training and testing sets was established at 8:2, with the initial 173 groups designated as training samples and the final 43 groups allocated for testing.…”
Section: Raw Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no water in the pores or micro-cracks, there is no so-called F-T damage, i.e., dry rocks are hardly affected by F-T cycles [29]. When the temperature rose, the ice in the pores or micro-cracks melted, accompanied the release of frozen stress and the migration of water, thus accelerating the damage [30]. After repeated F-T cycle tests, therefore, numerous defects inside the samples caused the changes in In general, the F-T damage of rocks is mainly affected by the following factors: lithology, moisture content, number of F-T cycles, ionic solution, temperature range, and stress state [26,27].…”
Section: Effect On Dry Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a good choice to fill the cracks and joints of rock slopes with mortar [12]. This method can prevent melt water from flowing into the cracks between rock masses, thereby improving the integrity, strength, stiffness and F-T resistance of rock and soil [13,14]. However, one of the main problems of the filling method is to use a large amount of cement and sand, but the current unsustainable exploitation and non-renewable natural sand have led to less time for sand [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%