2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation models and implied lifetime distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This implicitly specified lifetime model may not match the explicitly assumed lifetime distribution in some characteristic such as the shape of failure rate function (see Ref. [1]). In this case, the assumption for the degradation model or assumption for the lifetime model should be adjusted to make them consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implicitly specified lifetime model may not match the explicitly assumed lifetime distribution in some characteristic such as the shape of failure rate function (see Ref. [1]). In this case, the assumption for the degradation model or assumption for the lifetime model should be adjusted to make them consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• t c ~U (1,60 The upper bound value of the uniform distribution is evaluated as 120, it is considered that system fault occurs mostly in the second degradation stage M 2 on this occasion. Early and late change-point distributions present the first and second half of whole change-point distribution, respectively.…”
Section: ~U(1120) Early Change-point Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, degradation process modeling is an important approach for evaluating the reliability of high reliable products [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors recommended strategies for choosing the most proper distribution among the candidates. In particular, Bae et al [3] asserted that careful attention should be paid before assuming the lifetime distribution for degradation data because the assumption of the degradation model may create a strong restriction on the lifetime distribution. To minimize the risk of model mis-specification, we introduce an empirical method rather than assuming a specified lifetime distribution: a logspline density estimation.…”
Section: Lifetime Distribution Based (Ldb) Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%