2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13021-021-00197-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation-driven changes in fine root carbon stocks, productivity, mortality, and decomposition rates in a palm swamp peat forest of the Peruvian Amazon

Abstract: Background Amazon palm swamp peatlands are major carbon (C) sinks and reservoirs. In Peru, this ecosystem is widely threatened owing to the recurrent practice of cutting Mauritia flexuosa palms for fruit harvesting. Such degradation could significantly damage peat deposits by altering C fluxes through fine root productivity, mortality, and decomposition rates which contribute to and regulate peat accumulation. Along a same peat formation, we studied an undegraded site (Intact), a moderately deg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf litter decomposition rates at the sites (0.77 to 1.17 year −1 ) are in the range of global values estimated for rain forests and swamps (1.3 and 0.9 year −1 , respectively; Zhang et al 2008) but slightly higher than rates measured in peat forests of Panama (0.60-0.83 year −1 ; Hoyos-Santillan et al 2015) or in palm swamp peatlands of Brazil (0.41-0.60 year −1 ; Sales et al 2020). Fine root litter at the sites decomposed twice as slowly as leaf litter, with rates between 0.35 and 0.55 year −1 (Dezzeo et al 2021), confirming the importance of belowground litter relative to aboveground litter inputs for peat accumulation in tropical systems (Chimner and Ewel 2005;Hoyos-Santillan et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Leaf litter decomposition rates at the sites (0.77 to 1.17 year −1 ) are in the range of global values estimated for rain forests and swamps (1.3 and 0.9 year −1 , respectively; Zhang et al 2008) but slightly higher than rates measured in peat forests of Panama (0.60-0.83 year −1 ; Hoyos-Santillan et al 2015) or in palm swamp peatlands of Brazil (0.41-0.60 year −1 ; Sales et al 2020). Fine root litter at the sites decomposed twice as slowly as leaf litter, with rates between 0.35 and 0.55 year −1 (Dezzeo et al 2021), confirming the importance of belowground litter relative to aboveground litter inputs for peat accumulation in tropical systems (Chimner and Ewel 2005;Hoyos-Santillan et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Values are average ± standard error # C outputs from heterotrophic respiration (Rh) are from this study, loss as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is the default IPCC value (Drösler et al 2014). C inputs from litterfall are from this research, inputs from root mortality are also site-specific (Dezzeo et al 2021). The soil CH 4 emission was measured at the sites (Hergoualc'h et al 2020) $ Peat C stock gained/lost per site are presented in SI2 and ABG was measured by Bhomia et al (2019) Peat stock gained/lost (5 year −1 ) − 7.9 ± 3.3 − 6.0 ± 2.9 9.9 ± 2.8 1.9 the Intact site (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Palm swamps are an important source of livelihood for many people throughout the region by providing income from fruit sales, and also deliver critical ecosystem services, such as food, water flux regulation, and hunting grounds (Gilmore et al, 2013;Virapongse et al, 2017;Schultz et al, 2019). The palm M. flexuosa is considered a "hyperkeystone" species (van der Hoek et al, 2019) and contributes to peat formation by producing vegetation litter both above and belowground (Dezzeo et al, 2021). M. flexuosa is dioecious, meaning that individual palms are either males (pollen producers) or females (fruit producers) (Holm et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, M. flexuosa abundance and density decrease in increasingly degraded sites (Horn et al, 2012;Hidalgo Pizango et al, 2022) and become more male-dominated which reduces the capacity of the species to reproduce (Virapongse et al, 2017;Falen Horna and Honorio Coronado, 2018). Consequences include a reduction in biomass and necromass C stocks and in litter C inputs which build up the peat over time (Hergoualc'h et al, 2017;Bhomia et al, 2019;Dezzeo et al, 2021;Hergoualc'h et al, 2023). Depending on the intensity of degradation the natural C sink capacity of the soil can be reduced, or the soil can turn into a C source (van Lent et al, 2019;Hergoualc'h et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%