2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation behaviour of self-reinforced 80L/20G PLGA devices in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
2
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…
[3] , sistemas para liberação controlada de drogas [4] , stents [5] e dispositivos ortopédicos [6] . Atualmente fazem parte do cotidiano dos centros cirúrgicos no mundo inteiro.

Embora muitos dispositivos protéticos artificiais estejam disponíveis, poucos podem substituir completamente todas as complexas funções biológicas.

…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
[3] , sistemas para liberação controlada de drogas [4] , stents [5] e dispositivos ortopédicos [6] . Atualmente fazem parte do cotidiano dos centros cirúrgicos no mundo inteiro.

Embora muitos dispositivos protéticos artificiais estejam disponíveis, poucos podem substituir completamente todas as complexas funções biológicas.

…”
unclassified
“…, sistemas para liberação controlada de drogas [4] , stents [5] e dispositivos ortopédicos [6] . Atualmente fazem parte do cotidiano dos centros cirúrgicos no mundo inteiro.…”
unclassified
“…Typical in vitro degradation models for absorbable polymers and absorbable medical devices incorporate hydrolysis but fewer models include compounding effects from the local environment. As demonstrated previously, temperature, [3][4][5] media composition, [6][7][8] local pH, 9,10 and the presence of mechanical loading 6,[11][12][13][14] have been shown to affect polymer properties during degradation in vitro. In particular, the presence of mechanical loading in vivo has been hypothesized to be a significant contributor to differences observed between in vitro and in vivo degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3 Synthetic HA has been extensively studied and used as it presents biocompatibility with bone minerals and does not present distinct phases of other calcium phosphates (Ca-P) when carefully synthesized. 7,8 However, implants made with pure HA exhibit low tensile strength, impact and fatigue resistance. 10,11 Recent research focuses on overcoming limitations of calcium phosphates and HA ceramics such as low bioresorbability, low surface area and low bioreactivity, and the improvement of their biological properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Synthetic HA nanoparticles exhibit good biocompatibility, bioactivity and osteoinducibility. [1][2][3][6][7][8] Due to its unique quantum confining effects and the reactivity of the surface area, nanocrystalline HA exhibits better bioactivity, biocompatibility and improved mechanical properties than microcrystalline and bulk HA. 9 HA is the major mineral component of bone and teeth structures, corresponding to about 30-70% of the mass of bones and teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%