2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-6816-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation behavior of hydrophilized PLGA scaffolds prepared by melt-molding particulate-leaching method: Comparison with control hydrophobic one

Abstract: Porous PLGA/PVA scaffolds as hydrophilized PLGA scaffolds for tissue engineering applications were fabricated by a novel melt-molding particulate leaching method (non-solvent method). The prepared scaffolds exhibited highly porous and open-cellular pore structures with almost same surface and interior porosities (pore size, 200-300 microm; porosity, about 90%). The in vitro degradation behavior of the PLGA and PLGA/PVA scaffolds was compared at 37 degrees C in PBS (pH 7.4) with and without the solution change … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in a study comparing a PLGA/PVA scaffold with hydrophilic properties, to another PLGA scaffold with hydrophobic properties, cell adhesion and growth faired better on the PLGA/PVA scaffolds. 113 Other hydrophilic materials that present highly hydrated surfaces (ie, hydrogels, polyethylene oxide, pHEMA, PEO) create a substantial barrier to protein adsorption and inhibit cellular adhesion. 37 …”
Section: Implant-associated Factors That Influence Fbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in a study comparing a PLGA/PVA scaffold with hydrophilic properties, to another PLGA scaffold with hydrophobic properties, cell adhesion and growth faired better on the PLGA/PVA scaffolds. 113 Other hydrophilic materials that present highly hydrated surfaces (ie, hydrogels, polyethylene oxide, pHEMA, PEO) create a substantial barrier to protein adsorption and inhibit cellular adhesion. 37 …”
Section: Implant-associated Factors That Influence Fbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLGA scaffolds, for instance, degraded faster in vivo than in vitro , 408 and in addition to phagocytosis, enzymatic hydrolysis, the regions of low pH at the cell–material interface, and biomechanical stress, increased wetting in biological conditions can be another factor responsible for this effect. 409 This is especially relevant for hydrophobic polymers, the category to which unmodified PLGA belongs.…”
Section: Additional Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher concentration of enzymes, free radicals, antibodies and other protein species adsorbed on the surface of the carriers could all significantly accelerate its degradation and increase the kinetic order of the release profiles. These factors, in addition to phagocytosis and increased wetting, are responsible for the fact that PLGA scaffolds, for instance, degrade faster in vivo than in vitro [91]. We know now that although size, shape, surface charge, chemistry and mechanical properties of nanoparticles influence their biodistribution profiles, the route of uptake and the mechanism of interaction with the cell are mainly determined by their protein corona [92], and similar effects are to be expected with respect to the cell and tissue response to any material in a biological milieu.…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%