2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-1963(03)00025-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation and recovery processes in arid grazing lands of central Australia. Part 1: soil and land resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
77
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, these conversions may hamper the interpretation of vegetation response changes as an altered sensitivity to climate anomalies. Other pressures than climate may further affect the vegetation state: factors such as altered fire regimes, overgrazing, introduction of invasive species and salinization are important, as well, and may furthermore alter the response of vegetation to climate anomalies [21,[44][45][46]. Moreover, CO 2 fertilization, altered fire and rainfall regimes may change the vegetation composition, which was suggested in the study of [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, these conversions may hamper the interpretation of vegetation response changes as an altered sensitivity to climate anomalies. Other pressures than climate may further affect the vegetation state: factors such as altered fire regimes, overgrazing, introduction of invasive species and salinization are important, as well, and may furthermore alter the response of vegetation to climate anomalies [21,[44][45][46]. Moreover, CO 2 fertilization, altered fire and rainfall regimes may change the vegetation composition, which was suggested in the study of [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most arid and sub-arid rangelands show non-equilibrium behaviors [33] in which short-term rainfall variability imposes dramatic changes in vegetation covers that mask the true contribution of grazing pressure relief [34]. The driving forces of grassland degradation or regeneration and their relative contributions are still unclear and context-based [35,36], and detection of the effects of grassland rehabilitation programs has been hampered because the impacts of all relevant factors have not been controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in basal cover may possibly not always be significant, as basal cover is the most constant parameter of this vegetation. The higher the stocking rate, the higher the decrease in canopy and canopy-spread cover and the longer resting period is needed for rangeland to recover (Milton et al, 1998;Sparrow et al, 2003;Tongway et al, 2003;Kraaij & Milton, 2006). According to Mworia et al (1997), the herbaceous biomass and cover in heavily grazed semi-arid rangeland did not recover after a two-year resting period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%