2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation and detection of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis DNA and proteins in flour of three genetically modified rice events submitted to a set of thermal processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar degradation results were observed for MON‐810 maize and RR soybean under autoclaving (Vijayakumar et al ., ). Our results about DNA degradation after heat treatment are in accordance with literature (van der Colff & Podivinsky, ; Wang et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar degradation results were observed for MON‐810 maize and RR soybean under autoclaving (Vijayakumar et al ., ). Our results about DNA degradation after heat treatment are in accordance with literature (van der Colff & Podivinsky, ; Wang et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The present study is the first to detect Cry1Ac in the fat body of lepidopteran larvae ( Figure 2 ), likely because we used Bt resistant strains of H. armigera , that can survive from the 1st instar on high doses of Cry1Ac toxin, whereas susceptible insects can only survive feeding on Bt-crops for a few days. Cry1Ac in the PM content, midgut and hemolymph was shown to be present as the 62–65 kDa activated toxin fragment ( Figure 3 ), which was demonstrated to be stable in in vitro activation studies and thermal treatment experiments [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Therefore, we speculated that Cry1Ac in the fat body of H. armigera larvae was still in the form of the activated toxin fragment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PCR methods depend on thermal cycler, which are complicated and time consuming, and fail to detect exogenous proteins ( Grel et al, 2011 ). Methods based on protein-specific expression, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the test strip, and Western blot ( Wang et al, 2015 ; Albright et al, 2016 ; Zeng et al, 2020 ), have also been applied to GM crops. While these methods are fast, they fail to sensitively and quantitatively detect the protein in GM crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%