2010
DOI: 10.1109/tdmr.2009.2025490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation Analysis of InP Buried Heterostructure Layers in Lasers Using Optical-Beam-Induced-Current Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, 1P OBIC microscopy has been implemented for rapid examination of semiconductor lasers (Stanciu & Botez, 2002; Takeshita et al, 2006). For example, investigation on the InP buried heterostructures in InAs/InP highly strained distributed feedback (DFB) laser revealed that the OBIC intensity increased with the aging of the material (Takeshita et al, 2010). It also highlighted the decrease in the number of carriers around the p‐type material of the mesa side wall as well as in the p‐type material of InP with aging.…”
Section: Microscopic Measurements Of Obicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, 1P OBIC microscopy has been implemented for rapid examination of semiconductor lasers (Stanciu & Botez, 2002; Takeshita et al, 2006). For example, investigation on the InP buried heterostructures in InAs/InP highly strained distributed feedback (DFB) laser revealed that the OBIC intensity increased with the aging of the material (Takeshita et al, 2010). It also highlighted the decrease in the number of carriers around the p‐type material of the mesa side wall as well as in the p‐type material of InP with aging.…”
Section: Microscopic Measurements Of Obicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.23, in the second-stage degradation, the operating current was increased by two different characteristics [39]: namely those of LDs with and without deviation from the t 0.5 deterioration. We concentrate on t 0.5 -deteriorationdeviation and conventional LDs, which are typical lasers with and without deviation from the t 0.5 deterioration, respectively.…”
Section: Inp Layer Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.24a. The short broken, solid, and long broken lines are the vertical profiles of the relative OBIC intensity before aging, the relative OBIC intensity after aging, and the relative OBIC intensity difference before and after aging, respectively (Modified from Takeshita et al [39]) n-type InP buried layer and the n-type InP substrate are isolated by the p-type InP buried layer, and the electrons generated in depletion layers (3) and (4) do not reach the n-type InP substrate. On the other hand, an additional OBIC generated around depletion layers (3) and (4) is obtained after aging.…”
Section: Inp Layer Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%