“…Thus, the low atomic utilization efficiency of chemodynamic agents discounts the therapeutic efficacy of CDT. Another challenge limiting the CDT efficiency is the glutathione (GSH)-related cellular antioxidant defense system. − The high concentration of GSH (1–10 mM) leads to the elimination of •OH from the tumor microenvironment (TME), also deteriorating the •OH-mediated CDT treatment. , Additionally, the majority of inorganic chemodynamic agents previously reported are nonbiodegradable substances with long-term body retention, thus exerting potential biosafety issues and adverse biological effects. , Although renal clearable ultrasmall nanomaterials (<6 nm) could mitigate the long-term body retention issues, it would decrease the tumor accumulation due to the weakened enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. , To address these issues, numerous efforts have been devoted to TME-degradable chemodynamic agents for efficient CDT treatment of cancer. ,− However, the use of TME-responsive chemodyamic agents is mainly limited to the release of embedded metal ions or partial degradation with drug carriers still retained in the body over a prolonged period of time. Therefore, it is highly imperative to develop body-clearable, TME-degradable chemodynamic agents without compromising the therapeutic efficacy for efficient anticancer treatment.…”