Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.1080/03009480510013051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deglaciation chronology and glaciomarine successions in the Malangen–Målselv area, northern Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 340 cal. yr BP) (Eilertsen et al, 2005). Malangen fjord -the recipient of the Dividalen and Målselv rivers -was influenced by glaciomarine conditions until ca.…”
Section: Deglaciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 340 cal. yr BP) (Eilertsen et al, 2005). Malangen fjord -the recipient of the Dividalen and Målselv rivers -was influenced by glaciomarine conditions until ca.…”
Section: Deglaciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their resulting chronology spans the time of glacier retreat from the shelf edge to the innermost fjords. We have adjusted this chronology for the Preboreal (Stordal I, II and III), based on more detailed radiocarbon and shoreline correlation dating of Preboreal moraines in Lyngen-Storfjord (Corner, 1980) and Malangen-Målselv (Eilertsen et al, 2005), where two major, and one minor, climatically controlled moraine sub-stages and several topographically controlled ice-front accumulations have been recognised. Based on this body of work, the resulting chronology (in cal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For detailed description of the valley deposits and of the geological evolution of the Målselv valley, see Eilertsen (2002) and Eilertsen et al (2005Eilertsen et al ( , 2006. The area has also been subject to mapping of recent and old slide scars and active erosion (Hansen et al 2002), and the distribution of slide scars is compared to the overall valley fill (Eilertsen and Hansen 2004).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%