2001
DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.20160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degenerative arthritis of the wrist: Proximal row carpectomy versus scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
184
4
16

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
184
4
16
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may help to explain why the clinical results after scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy are so comparable, as were reported by Cohen [3] and Wyrick [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This finding may help to explain why the clinical results after scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy are so comparable, as were reported by Cohen [3] and Wyrick [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Static SL dissociation was seen on the left side in 2 patients and on the right side in 10 patients. The time from injury to surgery averaged 8 months (range: [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The average follow-up period after surgery was 15.8 months (range: 13-34).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Patients with chronic static SL dissociation usually have complete detachment of the dorsal SL ligament with elongation of the secondary stabilizers. 5 Several surgical procedures have been recommended for the treatment of this stage of scapholunate dissociation, including limited arthrodesis, 6 capsulodesis, 7,8 tenodesis, 5 proximal row carpectomy, 9 and bone-ligament-bone reconstuction. 10 Blatt 7 described an indirect soft tissue reconstruction using a flap of wrist capsule based on the radius inserted into the distal pole of the scaphoid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaphoid excision combined with a four-bone fusion is an alternative motion-preserving treatment. However, the surgeon may have reasons to recommend a PRC: greater wrist motion, [18][19][20] shorter surgical time, shorter postoperative immobilization, and lack of the need to achieve bony union.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%