2011
DOI: 10.1002/mana.200810196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degenerate elliptic operators, Feller semigroups and modified Bernstein‐Schnabl operators

Abstract: In this paper we study a class of elliptic second-order differential operators on finite dimensional convex compact\ud sets whose principal part degenerates on a subset of the boundary of the domain. We show that the closures\ud of these operators generate Feller semigroups.\ud Moreover, we approximate these semigroups by iterates of suitable positive linear operators which we also introduce\ud and study in this paper for the first time, and which we refer to as modified Bernstein-Schnabl operators.\ud As a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They prove that the closure A of the operator V generates a Feller semigroup true{Tttrue}t0 and further that the Feller semigroup true{Tttrue}t0 can be approximated by iterates of modified Bernstein–Schnabl operators ([4]). It should be emphasized that Theorem 1.2 coincides with [2, Theorem 4.1], [3, Theorem 4.3] and [5, Theorem 3.1] with K:=D if the boundary K is smooth, as in Example 1.1. 2°Theorem 1.2 is proved by Bony–Courrège–Priouret [8] in the elliptic case (see [8, Théorème XVI]) and then by Cancelier [9] in the non‐characteristic case: D=normalΣ3 (cf. [9, Théorème 7.2]).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They prove that the closure A of the operator V generates a Feller semigroup true{Tttrue}t0 and further that the Feller semigroup true{Tttrue}t0 can be approximated by iterates of modified Bernstein–Schnabl operators ([4]). It should be emphasized that Theorem 1.2 coincides with [2, Theorem 4.1], [3, Theorem 4.3] and [5, Theorem 3.1] with K:=D if the boundary K is smooth, as in Example 1.1. 2°Theorem 1.2 is proved by Bony–Courrège–Priouret [8] in the elliptic case (see [8, Théorème XVI]) and then by Cancelier [9] in the non‐characteristic case: D=normalΣ3 (cf. [9, Théorème 7.2]).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This paper is inspired by the work of Altomare et al. [2, 3] and [5] (see Remark 1.3), and it is a continuation of the previous papers Taira [23] through [31] and Taira–Favini–Romanelli [32].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bernstein-Schnabl operators, introduced by Schnabl in [25] and successively by Grossmann [20] and Nishishiraho [22,23] in different contexts, were intensively studied by Altomare (see [2], [6, Section 6.1] and the references therein) in association with a positive projection on C (K) and through the last twenty years they have been the subject of several researches and generalizations. For more details, we refer the interested reader to the survey [12] and its numerous references, but also to [9][10][11]24], among many others.…”
Section: Bernstein-schnabl Operators Associated With Markov Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%