The Cretaceous-Tertiary Event and Other Catastrophes in Earth History 1996
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2307-8.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degassing of sedimentary rocks due to Chicxulub impact: Hydrocode and physical simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we did not attempt to model the detailed stratigraphy of the Chicxulub area (e.g., the water layer), the features of our calculation correlate well with the model developed from the field data. Our calculations exhibit more of the features than other efforts that attempted to match the initial Chicxulub strata [Ivanov et al, 1996]. Referring to Figure 2 and starting at the right edge of the crater, the calculations show the downward displacement of material near and below the surface.…”
Section: Figure 1 La Shows Various Crater Ratios As a Function Of Ys/mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…While we did not attempt to model the detailed stratigraphy of the Chicxulub area (e.g., the water layer), the features of our calculation correlate well with the model developed from the field data. Our calculations exhibit more of the features than other efforts that attempted to match the initial Chicxulub strata [Ivanov et al, 1996]. Referring to Figure 2 and starting at the right edge of the crater, the calculations show the downward displacement of material near and below the surface.…”
Section: Figure 1 La Shows Various Crater Ratios As a Function Of Ys/mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…15b), is slightly different from that of the CEMY, showing a pronounced positive As anomaly and relatively higher U and Sr normalized abundances. The differences in the calculated CTIY composition and that of the CEMY can be attributed to an incomplete record of Cretaceous, and possibly older, lithologies of the target volume that was sampled by the Yax-1 borehole (e.g., the borehole did not intersect any clastic sedimentary rocks), to the devolatilization of anhydrite and other highly volatile phases (e.g., As) during the impact event (as postulated by, e.g., Sigurdsson et al 1992or Ivanov et al 1996, and to the presence of quite a significant amount of calcite and barite in the impactites.…”
Section: Carbonate End-membermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaporites are supposed to have released large volumes of sulfur components (SO X ) to the atmosphere upon shock vaporization (Pope et al 1994;Ivanov et al 1996;Pierazzo et al 1998;Yang and Ahrens 1998;Gupta et al 2001). However, the precise degassing conditions of evaporites are even more complex and less known than those of carbonates.…”
Section: Evaporites In the Target Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact presumably injected large quantities of volatiles (CO 2 , H 2 O, SO X ) and dust, which were released by shock vaporization and comminution of the target rock into the atmosphere. Their accumulation in the atmosphere likely lead to a strong perturbation of the Earth's climate (Pope et al 1994;Ivanov et al 1996;Pope et al 1997;Pierazzo et al 1998;Yang and Ahrens 1998;Gupta et al 2001). Recently, several models converged toward a calculated volume in the range of 10 17 g of SO X released.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%