“…The discursive legitimacies of knowledge-that is, in its conventional forms produced through logic and reason, backed by empirical evidence-are also influenced by aesthetic conditions-experiences of meaningfulness (for example: the regulation of ambiguity, senses of belonging and identity, anticipation related to form and other characteristics of communication linked to sociocultural context, performativity, narrative techniques, etc.) that fall outside of rational empirical boundaries, but which nevertheless play a role in shaping discourse legitimacy (Lithgow 2012(Lithgow , 2013(Lithgow , 2016(Lithgow , 2017. The presence of aesthetic priorities in the day-to-day routines of the embedded artist similarly creates possibilities for, as Jacques Rancière (2004) says, redistributions of the sensible, allowing for free play or shifts between a given reality and another while leaving room for ambiguity and uncertainty.…”