2019
DOI: 10.30738/indomath.v2i2.4701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defragmenting Struktur Berpikir Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bangun Datar

Abstract: This research purpose to description students’ error in solving problem of two dimension and effort defragmentation. Error analysis which execute base on concept construction error theory that include logical thinking error and hole contruction. This research done execute on students junior high school at eight grade of SMP in Pasuruan who finished two dimension material. Research subject is chose by students who are did mistake considerate of finishing comprehensiveness of students problem base Newman’s steps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hal ini membuktikan bahwa siswa yang memiliki kesalahan membaca dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika mampu melengkapi dan menata ulang struktur berpikir dengan memperbaiki kesalahan dan melengkapi tahapan berpikir dari tahap mengingat sampai tahap mengevaluasi dalam menyelesaikan masalah setelah pemberian defragmentasi dari peneliti. Hal ini sesuai dengan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan Supiarmo (2021) dan Bahrudin et al (2019) yang mendeskripsikan bahwa defragmentasi dapat memperbaiki kesalahan struktur berpikir dalam memecahkan masalah matematika.…”
Section: Dataunclassified
“…Hal ini membuktikan bahwa siswa yang memiliki kesalahan membaca dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika mampu melengkapi dan menata ulang struktur berpikir dengan memperbaiki kesalahan dan melengkapi tahapan berpikir dari tahap mengingat sampai tahap mengevaluasi dalam menyelesaikan masalah setelah pemberian defragmentasi dari peneliti. Hal ini sesuai dengan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan Supiarmo (2021) dan Bahrudin et al (2019) yang mendeskripsikan bahwa defragmentasi dapat memperbaiki kesalahan struktur berpikir dalam memecahkan masalah matematika.…”
Section: Dataunclassified
“…In addition, based on the results of interviews with mathematics teachers at the school, they explained that errors were caused because students had difficulty understanding problems, making plans for completion, lack of knowledge of prerequisite material, and not being able to explain in detail the reasons related to the solutions found. Thus, this problem is the cause of problems with students' thinking schemes related to errors in solving problems (Bahrudin et al, 2019;Dorko, 2019;Tambunan, 2019). Therefore, appropriate treatment is needed to rearrange and improve the thinking structure related to the student's mistakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on defragmenting thinking structures have been carried out, including the research of Muhtadin (2020) which provides a defragmentation of students' thinking processes in solving story problems. Research by Bahrudin et al (2019), defragmenting students' thinking processes in solving the problem of flat shapes. Hidayanto's research (2017) shows that defragmenting students' thinking processes in solving mathematical problems, especially geometric problems, is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a process of restructuring students thinking into broader thinking structure so it can reach the deeper understanding and solve problems given (Subanji, 2016). Sakif in (Bahrudin et al, 2019) defined thinking structure defragmenting is a restructuring of students' thinking when having error in solving mathematical problems through the process of disequllibria, conflict cognitive, dan scaffolding so that students can fix their errors. Disequllibria is a condition where someone finds difficulty of confusion that reflects the unbalance between assimilation and accommodation (Subanji, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%