2003
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2003.812682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformed fuzzy automata for correcting imperfect strings of fuzzy symbols

Abstract: This paper presents a fuzzy method for the recognition of strings of fuzzy symbols containing substitution, deletion, and insertion errors. As a preliminary step, we propose a fuzzy automaton to calculate a similarity value between strings. The adequate selection of fuzzy operations for computing the transitions of the fuzzy automaton allows to obtain different string similarity definitions (including the Levenshtein distance). A deformed fuzzy automaton based on this fuzzy automaton is then introduced in orde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…early 1970s [16], [32]; a few attempts [4] and [8] have already been made for applying this kind of fuzzy automata to control. It might be highly interesting to bridge the gap among the supervisory control theory of FACVs, control of fuzzy automata with fuzzy inputs, and fuzzy control, by using our retraction principle and generalized extension principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…early 1970s [16], [32]; a few attempts [4] and [8] have already been made for applying this kind of fuzzy automata to control. It might be highly interesting to bridge the gap among the supervisory control theory of FACVs, control of fuzzy automata with fuzzy inputs, and fuzzy control, by using our retraction principle and generalized extension principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of information technology, more and more scholars had studied FA, and had achieved fruitful results in theories [9] [10] and applications [11] [12]. Giles et al (1992) [13] used a complete gradient algorithm to derive a Tomita language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature up to now, various variants of fuzzy automata have been proposed in different modeling situations (see, for example, [2,6,7,8,9,10,16,17,22,23,26,27,28,33,38]) and the notions of fuzzy automata and fuzzy languages have proved useful in many areas [1,4,11,12,13,20,21,30,31,32,34,35,37,39]. In terms of fuzzy transition functions, fuzzy automata may be broadly classified into three types: The first type [1,3,6,7,9,11,12,13,16,21,22,23,27,28,32,33,35,37,39] uses fuzzy transition functions like δ : Q × Σ −→ F (Q), where Q represents the state set, Σ is the input alphabet, and F (Q) is the set...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of fuzzy transition functions, fuzzy automata may be broadly classified into three types: The first type [1,3,6,7,9,11,12,13,16,21,22,23,27,28,32,33,35,37,39] uses fuzzy transition functions like δ : Q × Σ −→ F (Q), where Q represents the state set, Σ is the input alphabet, and F (Q) is the set of all fuzzy subsets of Q. Note that such a fuzzy transition function can be equivalently converted into δ : Q × Σ × Q −→ [0, 1] and can also be represented by fuzzy states and fuzzy transition matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%