1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01388711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation theory, generic vanishing theorems, and some conjectures of Enriques, Catanese and Beauville

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
259
0
5

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
259
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2013.1 theorem with some index k. Since each complex C j is an iterated extension of Ra * Ω p X [n − p], the above shows that RΦ P C j ∈ c D k coh (OÂ), and hence that RΦ P (gr F p M i ) = 0 for every p ∈ Z and i > k. Because the Fourier-Mukai transform is an equivalence of categories, we conclude that M i = 0 for i > k, which means that δ(a) k. EXAMPLE 4.8. Our result explains the original counterexample from [11,Section 3]. The example consisted in blowing up an abelian variety A of dimension four along a smooth curve C of genus at least two; if X denotes the resulting variety, then a : X → A is the Albanese mapping, and a short computation shows that…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2013.1 theorem with some index k. Since each complex C j is an iterated extension of Ra * Ω p X [n − p], the above shows that RΦ P C j ∈ c D k coh (OÂ), and hence that RΦ P (gr F p M i ) = 0 for every p ∈ Z and i > k. Because the Fourier-Mukai transform is an equivalence of categories, we conclude that M i = 0 for i > k, which means that δ(a) k. EXAMPLE 4.8. Our result explains the original counterexample from [11,Section 3]. The example consisted in blowing up an abelian variety A of dimension four along a smooth curve C of genus at least two; if X denotes the resulting variety, then a : X → A is the Albanese mapping, and a short computation shows that…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This allows one to recover the original generic vanishing theorem for ω X of [11], as well as its extension to higher direct images R j a * ω X given in [14]. Indeed, in the proof above note that…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations