1993
DOI: 10.1090/memo/0506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation quantization for actions of 𝑅^{𝑑}

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
369
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(385 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
369
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…where the components c t , c α , c α * , c β , c β * , which are elements in B θ ⊗ B θ ⊗ B θ ⊗ B θ , have an expression of the same form as the corresponding operators in (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) with the symbol d substituted by the tensor product symbol ⊗ . The vanishing of bc, which has six hundred terms, can be checked directly from the commutation relations (9).…”
Section: The Noncommutative 4-spherementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the components c t , c α , c α * , c β , c β * , which are elements in B θ ⊗ B θ ⊗ B θ ⊗ B θ , have an expression of the same form as the corresponding operators in (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) with the symbol d substituted by the tensor product symbol ⊗ . The vanishing of bc, which has six hundred terms, can be checked directly from the commutation relations (9).…”
Section: The Noncommutative 4-spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall in fact describe a very general construction of isospectral deformations of noncommutative geometries which implies in particular that any compact spin Riemannian manifold M whose isometry group has rank ≥ 2 admits a natural one-parameter isospectral deformation to noncommutative geometries M θ . The deformation of the algebra will be performed along the lines of [23]. We let (A, H, D) be the canonical spectral triple associated with a compact Riemannian spin manifold M. We recall that A = C ∞ (M) is the algebra of smooth functions on M, H = L 2 (M, S) is the Hilbert space of spinors and D is the Dirac operator.…”
Section: Isospectral Deformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and each f ∈ C ∞ (M) is the sum of a unique series f = r∈Z n f r , which is rapidly convergent in the Fréchet topology of C ∞ (M) (see [33] for more details). Let now θ = (θ jk = −θ kj ) be a real antisymmetric n × n matrix.…”
Section: Deforming a Torus Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, by the very definition of the product × θ in (3.2) one establishes that 8) proving that the algebra C ∞ (M) equipped with the product × θ is isomorphic to the algebra L θ (C ∞ (M)). It is shown in [33] that there is a natural completion of the algebra C ∞ (M θ ) to a C * -algebra C(M θ ) whose smooth subalgebra -under the extended action of T n -is precisely C ∞ (M θ ). Thus, we can understand L θ as a quantization map from…”
Section: Deforming a Torus Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the purpose of physical applications, we should as well consider quantum groups arising from deformations of kinematical symmetries, as for instance the Heisenberg or the Euclidean groups [13][14][15][16]. This paper deals with the two dimensional Euclidean group, whose q-deformations have been deeply analyzed by many authors [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]: the novelty of the present approach is that we shall show how different aspects previously considered can be unified by an appropriate use of quantum homogeneous spaces of E q (2), which are recognized as "quantum planes" [26,27] and "quantum hyperboloids" [28]. Since the Euclidean quantum algebra acts canonically on the latter, the action can be used to recover a quantum analog of many results of the classical theory and, in a certain sense, to establish the defining automorphisms of a concrete model of noncommutative geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%