The external manifestation of the so-called second (free) form of flow for loose materials in bunkers during discharge is descent of the charge surface parallel to itself, or as it is customary to assume, material movement as a whole column alon~ the wall.It is well known that this form of flow occurs, as a rule, in high silo bins (H = H/D ~ 3-4; H is silo height, D is diameter).The second form attracts most attention both from specialists in the field of loose body mechanics, and specialists in the field of design, planning, and operating silo structures. This interest is caused by the fact that with the second form of movement horizontal pressures on the silo walls increase by a factor of 2 to 2.5 compared with static pressures, and according to some data even by a factor of 5-7 [i]. Increased pressures develop at a certain characteristic height asymmetric relative to the bunker axis of symmetry and they have a pulsating character [2,3].The increase in pressure at the~closing surface during discharge, as already noted in [4], is connected with a freely formed change in flow and even with sonic shock waves.A number of researchers are inclined to explain this increase by dynamic phenomena [5] (whence the extensively used term "dynamic" loading).There is no single view on the nature of the rest of these facts.Standards set in most countries for determining static loads on silo el~ents recommend the method proposed in 1895 by Janssen [6] in spite of the existence of many other methods. This selection is dictated by the simplicity of relationships obtained in [6], and numerous verifications of calculated results by experiments.This situation is a weighty argument in favor taking the Janssen relationships as a basis for determining dynamic loads (in future we will call them peak or maximum loads). However, the difference in views on the mechanism of load formation, and, as a consequence of this ambiguity in estimates of absolute values of the latter, leads to the fact that the load curves for the same structure calculated by standards of different countries differ markedly.This paradoxical fact is illustrated in Fig.