2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118992487.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation of Core and Lower Mantle Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 95 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the strain imposed under a conventional DAC is probably not large enough to observe the LPO of specimens from their steady‐state deformation (Tsujino et al., 2016), and even measuring the imposed strain on specimens in a DAC is challenging. Moreover, it is difficult to quantify the pressure effects separately because deformation and pressure are coupled in the DAC experiments (Merkel & Cordier, 2016). Nevertheless, the conventional DAC is the only apparatus that allows experiments to be conducted under pressure conditions relevant to the lower mantle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the strain imposed under a conventional DAC is probably not large enough to observe the LPO of specimens from their steady‐state deformation (Tsujino et al., 2016), and even measuring the imposed strain on specimens in a DAC is challenging. Moreover, it is difficult to quantify the pressure effects separately because deformation and pressure are coupled in the DAC experiments (Merkel & Cordier, 2016). Nevertheless, the conventional DAC is the only apparatus that allows experiments to be conducted under pressure conditions relevant to the lower mantle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%