2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation of caveolae impacts global transcription and translation processes through relocalization of cavin-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, cavin proteins are released from the PM when caveolae are disassembled. Cavin1 has been localized in the cell nucleus, where it regulates rRNA transcription in response to insulin stimulation and osmotic stress [ 99 , 100 ]. Cavin3 could also enter the nucleus when caveolae are disassembled by ultraviolet light exposure, and nuclear Cavin3 regulates DNA damage and apoptosis through the interaction with the phosphatase PP1α [ 101 ] and BRCA1 [ 102 ].…”
Section: Caveolae: Composition Organization and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cavin proteins are released from the PM when caveolae are disassembled. Cavin1 has been localized in the cell nucleus, where it regulates rRNA transcription in response to insulin stimulation and osmotic stress [ 99 , 100 ]. Cavin3 could also enter the nucleus when caveolae are disassembled by ultraviolet light exposure, and nuclear Cavin3 regulates DNA damage and apoptosis through the interaction with the phosphatase PP1α [ 101 ] and BRCA1 [ 102 ].…”
Section: Caveolae: Composition Organization and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, our STED-CLEM approach cannot evaluate quantitative changes in protein levels at caveolae membrane sites. Consequently, different results will be observed compared to other analysis of cavin plasma membrane localization and cavin-caveolin1 40 , 49 , 61 or caveolin1-caveolin1 62 , 63 association after osmotic shock. Future experiments are needed to dismantle these discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%