2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.3046266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation Method of Self-Mixing Laser Sensor’s Feedback Phase for Estimation of Optical Feedback Coupling Factor and Displacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameters C and can be estimated from SMI vibrometric signals in air at rest [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Among the different methods, some are only effective in weak feedback [ 23 , 24 , 25 ] and others only in moderate feedback [ 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parameters C and can be estimated from SMI vibrometric signals in air at rest [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Among the different methods, some are only effective in weak feedback [ 23 , 24 , 25 ] and others only in moderate feedback [ 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if the distance between the LD and the retro-reflective surface is about 20 cm, an acoustic wave at 112 dB SPL induces an optical path variation of 1.2 nanometers [ 13 ], which is three orders of magnitude below mechanical vibrations of a few micrometers [ 3 ]. For the measurement of C and in strong feedback regime, the methods can be divided into two categories: phase unwrapping methods [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 ] and direct SMI signal analysis methods [ 32 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%