Deformation Characteristics of Cold-Worked and Recrystallized Zircaloy-4 Cladding

Abstract

Thermomechanical processing of Zircaloy-4 cladding plays a major role in determining its deformation behavior. Crystallographic texture and the related anisotropy in mechanical properties of Zircaloy-4 have been shown to be affected by different processing paths. In this program, the deformation behavior of four Zircaloy-4 cladding types was evaluated in laboratory and in-reactor studies under typical pressurized-water reactor (PWR) conditions. In particular, the creep behavior, stress-free growth, and mechanical property changes of these materials were examined. The irradiation program consisted of four specimen cluster assemblies, each containing 16 rods, irradiated in guide tube locations of fuel assemblies in the Oconee-2 reactor. Twelve of the 16 rods in each cluster were prepressurized so that nominal inreactor compressive hoop stresses of 69.0, 86.2, and 103.4 MPa (10, 12.5, and 15 ksi) were maintained. The remaining four rods were open to the coolant and served as stress-free irradiation growth specimens. One specimen cluster was examined after each of four reactor cycles. Local fast neutron fluences ranged up to 1.3 × 1022 n/cm2 (E > 0.1 MeV), while irradiation temperatures ranged from 569 to 591 K (565 to 605°F). Post-irradiation tension and burst tests were conducted at 616 K (650°F) to determine changes in the mechanical properties as a function of fluence. The ex-reactor thermal creep behavior was examined at 672 K (750°F) in a series of multiaxial creep tests where the hoop/axial stress ratio was held constant at several different values. These data were used to construct a partial creep locus at a constant value of the dissipative work function. Results indicate that the in-reactor axial creep and stress-free growth are highly dependent on the cladding fabrication schedules. Most of the axial strain exhibited by the cold-worked, stress-relieved cladding types S1, V1, and V2, consists of irradiation growth, while in the recrystallized type S2, axial creep predominates. In-reactor diametral creep strain exhibited an initial transient regime at fast neutron fluences below 3 to 5 × 1021n/cm2 (E > 0.1 MeV) with a creep rate decreasing to a steady state at higher fluences. In contrast to axial creep behavior, the cladding with the highest level of retained cold work (S1) exhibited the highest diametral creepdown while recrystallized type S2 showed the least creepdown of the four cladding types. The hoop/axial strain rate ratio, εθ/εz, remained essentially constant over the fluence and stress ranges investigated, but its magnitude was significantly different between the S1 and S2 cladding types. A comparison between the in-reactor deformation and ex-reactor thermal creep behavior shows that the relative ranking of the materials in creep resistance is consistent in both environments. An analysis of the anisotropy of in-reactor deformation and a comparison with the thermal creep anisotropy are also provided. Post-irradiation axial tension and burst tests at 616 K (650°F) indicated that the most cold-worked material, S1, maintained the highest strength. In axial tension, it also retained the highest uniform and total elongations. In the burst tests, the more recrystallized cladding types. S2 and V2, exhibited the highest total circumferential elongations. Irradiation-induced changes in mechanical properties were significantly greater in the recrystallized cladding material.

Fast, quantitative, and nondestructive evaluation of hydrided LWR fuel cladding by small angle incoherent neutron scattering of hydrogen

“…For Zircaloy cladding, a thermal treatment (usually <600°C) is the final processing step; it usually results in full recrystallization (manifested as equiaxed grains) or partial retention of the cold work (manifested as elongated grains along the rolling direction) from the final size-reducing treatment [18][19][20]. Fig.…”

Creep and Yield Loci of Zircaloy Cladding at Elevated Temperatures

“…These preferred orientations are responsible for the resulting mechanical anisotropy of Zircaloy. Thus, recent emphasis has been on the behavior of the cladding subjected to biaxial loading [Murty and Adams, 1985, Kallstrom et al, 1974, Stehle et al, 1977, Baty et al, 1984, Yoon, 1979, Suzuki et al, 1985]. Suzuki et al, 1985 investigated the yield loci of commercial Zircaloy-2 and Zircaloy-4 cladding tubes at elevated temperatures by performing internal pressurization tests with superimposed axial loading.…”