1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf01116390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation and failure of rolled beryllium of differing degrees of purity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Å and c/a=1.60, well comparable to the experimental values of 3.21 Å and 1.62 [33,34]. The calculated cohesive energy is −1.52 eV/atom, also in good agreement with the experimental value of −1.51 eV/atom [33,34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Å and c/a=1.60, well comparable to the experimental values of 3.21 Å and 1.62 [33,34]. The calculated cohesive energy is −1.52 eV/atom, also in good agreement with the experimental value of −1.51 eV/atom [33,34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The data were then fitted to the Birch-Murnaghan equation of state [21], which predicted a lattice constant of a = 0.319 nm and c/a = 1.62. These values are in good agreement with the corresponding experimental value of a = 0.321 nm and c/a = 1.624 [22]. The cohesive energy was calculated as a difference between the total energy per atom in a bulk crystal and the total energy of a free atom.…”
Section: Bulk Mg and H 2 Molecularmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The data was then fitted to the Birch-Murnaghan equation of state [14], which predicted a lattice constant of a = 0.319 nm and c/a = 1.62. These values are in good agreement with the corresponding experimental values of a = 0.321 nm and c/a = 1.624 [15]. The cohesive energy was calculated as a difference between the total energy per atom in a bulk crystal and the total energy of a free atom.…”
Section: Bulkmentioning
confidence: 74%