2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01045-4_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformable MRI-Ultrasound Registration via Attribute Matching and Mutual-Saliency Weighting for Image-Guided Neurosurgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of landmark-based methods in non-linear image registration depends on both finding enough landmarks that cover the entire volume, and correctly finding their corresponding landmarks in the second volume. The voxel-wise attribute-based method of Machado et al [13] (team cDRAMMS) did relatively well despite the fact that iUS and MRI have drastically different salient features, and ranked third in a tie with Drobny et al [12] (team NiftyReg). The top three algorithms in this challenge [12][13][14] were all intensity-based techniques, which calculated a dense transformation map by utilizing intensity values at all locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of landmark-based methods in non-linear image registration depends on both finding enough landmarks that cover the entire volume, and correctly finding their corresponding landmarks in the second volume. The voxel-wise attribute-based method of Machado et al [13] (team cDRAMMS) did relatively well despite the fact that iUS and MRI have drastically different salient features, and ranked third in a tie with Drobny et al [12] (team NiftyReg). The top three algorithms in this challenge [12][13][14] were all intensity-based techniques, which calculated a dense transformation map by utilizing intensity values at all locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machado et al [13] extended the Deformable Registration via Attribute Matching and Mutual-Saliency Weighting (DRAMMS) algorithm [19], a general-purpose algorithm [20], specifically for the US-MRI registration problem, which they termed as correlation-similarity DRAMMS or cDRAMMS. They released it at https://www.nitrc.org/projects/dramms/ (version 1.5.1).…”
Section: A Team Cdrammsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies of medical image registration can be categorized into classical and learning-based methods [10][11][12]. Classical MRI to US image registration approaches include various choices of similarity metrics such as Correlation Coefficient (CC), and Correlation Ratio (CR), Mutual Information (MI), Normalized Correlation Coefficient (NCC), Self-Similarity Correlation (SSC), and Linear Correlation of Linear Combination (LC 2 ) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. One major drawback of the traditional methods is the high computational cost required to align every 3D MRI and iUS pair even with the efficient implementation on modern graphical processing units (GPUs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%