“…Based on the idea that stability provides efficiency, many works assume a predefined order of the organ analysis, usually defined heuristically, and driven by some intuitive notion of stability and/or inter-organ relations (Bloch et al, 2005(Bloch et al, , 2003Camara et al, 2004;Colliot et al, 2006;Hudelot et al, 2008;Jeong et al, 2008). Some authors solved the problem from a more quantitative approach, using image-based stability criteria, such as contrast or intensity variability, to define the order in which the organs were processed (Fletcher et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2007;Pizer et al, 2005). The anatomy of the human body has also been frequently exploited (Bloch et al, 2005;Fasquel et al, 2006;He et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2016;Udupa et al, 2013Udupa et al, , 2011Udupa and Saha, 2003;Wang and Smedby, 2014a, 2014b, using inter-organ relations, such as proximity (e.g., liver and the pancreas (Erdt et al, 2011;Hammon et al, 2013;Shimizu et al, 2010)), symmetry (e.g., left and right kidney (Camara et al, 2004)), inclusion (e.g., thoracic cavity and lungs (Camara et al, 2004;Udupa et al, 2011;Wang and Smedby, 2014b)), or intersection (e.g., hepatic vessels intersecting the liver (Fasquel et al, 2006)) to improve the computational models.…”