Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2002.1029184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformable m-rep segmentation of object complexes

Abstract: While we have previously reported on multiscale segmentation of single-figure anatomic objects from medical images by deformable m-rep models, here we report on a method of segmentation of multiple geometrically related single-figure objects from a medical image. Inter-object geometric effects within segmentation of structures in the male pelvis from CT in the planning of radiation therapy of the prostate will be illustrated. Given a model in which each object is formed from a mesh of medial atoms, the method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the idea that stability provides efficiency, many works assume a predefined order of the organ analysis, usually defined heuristically, and driven by some intuitive notion of stability and/or inter-organ relations (Bloch et al, 2005(Bloch et al, , 2003Camara et al, 2004;Colliot et al, 2006;Hudelot et al, 2008;Jeong et al, 2008). Some authors solved the problem from a more quantitative approach, using image-based stability criteria, such as contrast or intensity variability, to define the order in which the organs were processed (Fletcher et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2007;Pizer et al, 2005). The anatomy of the human body has also been frequently exploited (Bloch et al, 2005;Fasquel et al, 2006;He et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2016;Udupa et al, 2013Udupa et al, , 2011Udupa and Saha, 2003;Wang and Smedby, 2014a, 2014b, using inter-organ relations, such as proximity (e.g., liver and the pancreas (Erdt et al, 2011;Hammon et al, 2013;Shimizu et al, 2010)), symmetry (e.g., left and right kidney (Camara et al, 2004)), inclusion (e.g., thoracic cavity and lungs (Camara et al, 2004;Udupa et al, 2011;Wang and Smedby, 2014b)), or intersection (e.g., hepatic vessels intersecting the liver (Fasquel et al, 2006)) to improve the computational models.…”
Section: Sequential Organization Of Multiple Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the idea that stability provides efficiency, many works assume a predefined order of the organ analysis, usually defined heuristically, and driven by some intuitive notion of stability and/or inter-organ relations (Bloch et al, 2005(Bloch et al, , 2003Camara et al, 2004;Colliot et al, 2006;Hudelot et al, 2008;Jeong et al, 2008). Some authors solved the problem from a more quantitative approach, using image-based stability criteria, such as contrast or intensity variability, to define the order in which the organs were processed (Fletcher et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2007;Pizer et al, 2005). The anatomy of the human body has also been frequently exploited (Bloch et al, 2005;Fasquel et al, 2006;He et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2016;Udupa et al, 2013Udupa et al, , 2011Udupa and Saha, 2003;Wang and Smedby, 2014a, 2014b, using inter-organ relations, such as proximity (e.g., liver and the pancreas (Erdt et al, 2011;Hammon et al, 2013;Shimizu et al, 2010)), symmetry (e.g., left and right kidney (Camara et al, 2004)), inclusion (e.g., thoracic cavity and lungs (Camara et al, 2004;Udupa et al, 2011;Wang and Smedby, 2014b)), or intersection (e.g., hepatic vessels intersecting the liver (Fasquel et al, 2006)) to improve the computational models.…”
Section: Sequential Organization Of Multiple Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoDeM►Han and Prince, 2003; ArtM► Anas et al, 2016;Chen et al ,2014;Chen et al, 2010;Kamojima and Miyata, 2004;Kuo et al, 2009;Martin-Fernandez et al, 2009;Miyata et al, 2003 Pelvis GlM►Li et al, 2016; CoDeM► Costa et al, 2007;Hensel et al, 2007;Ma et al, 2013;Rousson et al, 2005;Song et al, 2013; MuLeM► Chaney et al, 2013;Fletcher et al, 2002;Jeong et al, 2006;Lu et al, 2007;Merck et al, 2008;Pizer et al, 2005;SeqM► Chandra et al, 2016;Jeong et al, 2008;Ma et al, 2010;Pizer et al, 2005; MaLrM► Gao et al, 2016;Seifert et al, 2009; AtM► Akhondi-Asl et al, 2014;Weisenfeld and Warfield, 2011; Hip CoDeM► Kainmüeller et al, 2009b; MuLeM► Bukovec et al, 2011;Yokota et al, 2009;SeqM► Yokota et al, 2013; MaLrM► Glocker et al, 2012;Montillo et al, 2011; ArtM► Balestra et al, 2014;Kainmüeller et al, 2009a;Yokota et al, 2009;Knee GlM►Fripp et al, 2007; CoDeM► Pang et al, 2015;Uzumbas et al, 2013;ArtM►Constantinescu et al, 2016;...…”
Section: Handunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Medial representation (m-reps) models [30] have been used to represent the 3D shape of the prostate [31]. They are composed of a set of medial atoms, which are linked together to describe an object [32]. Another nonlinear representation is the conditional shape probability distribution (CSPD) presented by Jeong et al [33].…”
Section: Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a),(c)). We propose to integrate this information to improve the segmentation robustness and accuracy inspired by [3,12]. Additional vertex connections are introduced that connect neighboring vertices of the existing endo-and epicardiac surface model ( Fig.…”
Section: Integration Of Prior Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%