2004
DOI: 10.2458/azu_jrm_v57i5_loeser
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defoliation increased above-ground productivity in a semi-arid grassland

Abstract: In light of the continuing debate regarding overcompensation we studied the responses of above -ground biomass in a high -elevation, semi -arid grassland to defoliation, defoliation history, and livestock grazing. The above -ground annual net primary productivity (ANPP) was measured over 2 years in one -hundred twenty, 1 -m2 plots that were exposed to single-and multi -year defoliation and grazing treatments. Plant communities showed an average increase in ANPP of 31 %-45% due to a single defoliation event.The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clipping to # 6 cm, however, apparently removed so much current year's leaf area that plant growth was unable to benefit from the increased availability of light. Increased plant yield in response to defoliation (i.e., overcompensation) has been documented elsewhere on semiarid rangeland of North America, including shortgrass prairie in north-central Colorado (Williamson et al 1989;Varnamkhasti et al 1995) and mountain grasslands in north-central Arizona (Loeser et al 2004) and northern Wyoming (Frank et al 2002). Plant yield in the summer of 1999, however, was not increased on our foothill sagebrush steppe site in response to 9-cm clipping in April or May 1999.…”
Section: Monthsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Clipping to # 6 cm, however, apparently removed so much current year's leaf area that plant growth was unable to benefit from the increased availability of light. Increased plant yield in response to defoliation (i.e., overcompensation) has been documented elsewhere on semiarid rangeland of North America, including shortgrass prairie in north-central Colorado (Williamson et al 1989;Varnamkhasti et al 1995) and mountain grasslands in north-central Arizona (Loeser et al 2004) and northern Wyoming (Frank et al 2002). Plant yield in the summer of 1999, however, was not increased on our foothill sagebrush steppe site in response to 9-cm clipping in April or May 1999.…”
Section: Monthsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…At our study site the grazing‐tolerant bunchgrass, E. elymoides , has expanded its range within the last century and currently occurs as a dominant species across large areas (M.R.R.L., unpublished data). We hypothesize that a century of livestock grazing, and in particular a multidecadal period of intensive grazing in the late 1800s, increased the relative composition of grazing‐tolerant species (Loeser et al 2004). Incomplete records from our site also suggest that community composition has been more stable during the last half of the twentieth century, leading up to the current period of rapid spread of exotic species, which our data suggest is being facilitated by recurrent drought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grazing management can affect soil C storage by altering above-and belowground plant C allocation (Holland et al 1992;Johnson and Matchett 2001), net primary productivity (NPP; Frank and McNaughton 1993;Turner et al 1993), and soil respiration (Kieft 1994;Bremer et al 1998;Cao et al 2004). Moderate grazing often increases aboveground NPP (ANPP;McNaughton 1985;Loeser et al 2004), and in perennial grasslands ANPP is frequently positively correlated with soil C pools when controlling for precipitation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%