2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2016.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defluoridation studies using active carbon derived from the barks of Ficus racemosa plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of carbon and oxygen elements in the activated biochar represents a percentage above 80%. Similar results were obtained byRavulapalli and Kunta (2017) with an adsorbent produced of Ficus racemosa peel. The high percentage of these elements confirms the carbonaceous characteristic of agricultural by-product adsorbents.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The contribution of carbon and oxygen elements in the activated biochar represents a percentage above 80%. Similar results were obtained byRavulapalli and Kunta (2017) with an adsorbent produced of Ficus racemosa peel. The high percentage of these elements confirms the carbonaceous characteristic of agricultural by-product adsorbents.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Likely, a study obtaining carbon from the barks of ficus racemosa reveals the greatest affinity of carbon precursor toward fluoride ions, also called "Active carbon derived from the barks of Ficusracemosa" (ACBFR) (Ravulapalli and Kunta 2017). The optimum pH for the fluoride removal was 7.0; beyond, a fall in the removal was observed, because a negative adsorption was featured by the lesser concentration of fluoride ions than that present in the bulk.…”
Section: Activated Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption kinetics: The adsorption kinetics are studied using pseudo-first and second-order models, intraparticle diffusion model and Elovich equations [28,29]. As per R 2 values, adsorption kinetics follows the order: pseudo second-order (0.9994) > pseudo first-order (0.9967) > interparticle diffusion model (0.9683) > Elovich model (0.922) in the case of NAHCSC; and pseudo second-order (0.9998) > pseudo first-order (0.9843) > Elovich (0.9694) > intraparticle diffusion model (0.9358) in the case of NALABC (Table-2).…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%