2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.048
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defluoridation of drinking water using a new flow column-electrocoagulation reactor (FCER) - Experimental, statistical, and economic approach

Abstract: A new batch, flow column electrocoagulation reactor (FCER) that utilises a perforated plate flow column as a mixer has been used to remove fluoride from drinking water. A comprehensive study has been carried out to assess its performance. The efficiency of fluoride removal (R%) as a function of key operational parameters such as initial pH, detention time (t), current density (CD), inter-electrode distance (ID) and initial concentration (C) has been examined and an empirical model has been developed. A scannin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three key parameters were investigated; the standard deviation, outliers and the normality (according to Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) of the obtained results. The standard deviation describes the amount of variation in the parameter under investigation; the smaller the standard deviation, the better the consistency and quality of the treatment process [44][45][46]. The presence of outliers, which could be defined as extreme observations, indicates a poor and unstable performance, while the normality of the obtained results enhances the ability to model treatment performance [47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three key parameters were investigated; the standard deviation, outliers and the normality (according to Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) of the obtained results. The standard deviation describes the amount of variation in the parameter under investigation; the smaller the standard deviation, the better the consistency and quality of the treatment process [44][45][46]. The presence of outliers, which could be defined as extreme observations, indicates a poor and unstable performance, while the normality of the obtained results enhances the ability to model treatment performance [47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It determines the quantity of the coagulant dissolved in the solution, the size of the flocs formed and hydrogen bubble production rates. Higher current density leads to generate more coagulant agents 48,49 ; more H2 bubble is generated, thereby increasing the formation of metal hydroxide and treatment efficiency 40,50 . (Fig.6) represents the effect of current density for MB removal using 0.1 M NaCl with 1.5 cm interelectrode spacing for different electrolysis times.…”
Section: Effect Of Current Density On Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have shown a great deal of interest in the development of models to reproduce their experiments as they are of great benefit regarding the design process, optimisation and reproduction of experimental works [38,39]. Therefore, part of the current study has been devoted to developing an empirical model to reproduce the development of the compressive strengths of mortars as a function of curing time (t) and the proportional contents of OPC, GGBS and HCFA in the newly developed binder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%