2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deflection of simply supported box girder including effect of shear lag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The box girder has two additional deformations caused by the shear lag effect and shearing action. Similar results from different researchers [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] have illustrated that the first additional deformation (AD1) caused by the shear lag effect at the mid-span of a simply supported box girder can approach 10% of the bending deflection when the height–span ratio exceeds 0.1. The second additional deformation (AD2) caused by the shear action can also reach 10% of the bending deflection when the shear span–depth ratio is lower than 1/20 [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The box girder has two additional deformations caused by the shear lag effect and shearing action. Similar results from different researchers [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] have illustrated that the first additional deformation (AD1) caused by the shear lag effect at the mid-span of a simply supported box girder can approach 10% of the bending deflection when the height–span ratio exceeds 0.1. The second additional deformation (AD2) caused by the shear action can also reach 10% of the bending deflection when the shear span–depth ratio is lower than 1/20 [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…To address these issues, keeping a constant value for λ for the entire calculating process is a simple solution. From the literature [ 16 , 37 ], Table 1 gives recommended values of λ for a single-cell beam under a simply supported condition.…”
Section: Icbm Modifications For Single-cell Box Girdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response result could be given in the form of deflection ratio. Lertsima et al [24] defined deflection ratio as the ratio of the deflection due to finite element analysis to that due to the beam theory solution. In that case the finite element result is taken as the actual solution because it includes the effects of shear deformation.…”
Section: Service Loads and Deflection Ratio Service Loads And Deflectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the plane beamtype model is not suitable for the structural design compared with the spatial beam-type and solid FE models for wide box girder. Lertsima et al 15,16 proposed the empirical calculation formula of the girder deflection at middle section considering the shear lag effects. Hua et al 17 studied the shear lag effects in wide box girder under construction state and vehicle loads based on the beam-type FE model and solid FE model, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%