2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definitive and adjuvant radiation therapy for external auditory canal and temporal bone squamous cell carcinomas: Long term outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 10 Similarly, another well‐known staging system, the MPB staging system (derived from EACSCC), has also been investigated as a significant prognostic factor for patients with TBSCC by numerous studies. 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 Nevertheless, most of these studies only confirmed the MPB‐T classification as a significant prognostic factor rather than the overall stage, which is consistent with our results. Meanwhile, the majority of the above‐mentioned studies included a heterogeneous population of patients with TBSCC, which mainly consisted of patients with EACSCC; thus, the validity of the MPB‐T classifications for MESCC remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 10 Similarly, another well‐known staging system, the MPB staging system (derived from EACSCC), has also been investigated as a significant prognostic factor for patients with TBSCC by numerous studies. 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 Nevertheless, most of these studies only confirmed the MPB‐T classification as a significant prognostic factor rather than the overall stage, which is consistent with our results. Meanwhile, the majority of the above‐mentioned studies included a heterogeneous population of patients with TBSCC, which mainly consisted of patients with EACSCC; thus, the validity of the MPB‐T classifications for MESCC remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, generalization of these results to the entire TBC population may yield inadequate accuracy and reliability 10 . Similarly, another well‐known staging system, the MPB staging system (derived from EACSCC), has also been investigated as a significant prognostic factor for patients with TBSCC by numerous studies 6,8,9,11–18 . Nevertheless, most of these studies only confirmed the MPB‐T classification as a significant prognostic factor rather than the overall stage, which is consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is well known that the prognosis for patients with TBSCC treated with chemo-radiotherapy alone is unsatisfactory [ 2 ]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently been described as an option to downstage borderline resectable tumors to aid margin free excision [ 45 ]. The role of chemotherapy has not been fully defined, but its application, as well as other non-surgical palliative treatments (radiotherapy, or specialist palliative care) are recommended for patients with loco-regionally advanced recurrent TBSCC [ 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy usually varies in different tumor types. At present, surgical resection combined with adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard therapeutic regimen for EACC patients [6, [42][43][44], especially for advanced EACC patients [45][46][47]. Adjuvant radiotherapy is also recommended in some early-stage EACC patients with some risk factors, such as positive surgical margin, parotid gland invasion, bone invasion, and peripheral nerve invasion [2,33,35,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%