Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Genocide and Memory 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65513-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definitions and Concepts of Genocide: Lemkin and the Concept of Genocide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the conceptual consistency of genocide, some scholars argue that the definition in the GC lacks details about the appropriate interpretation of each element of the crime of genocide, including a significant absence of how to interpret or understand the notions of “intent” or “destruction” (O’Brien, 2020; Özsu, 2020). Additionally, scholars have denounced how the legal definition diminished Raphael Lemkin’s initial concept (Özsu, 2020; Jacobs, 2018; Jones, 2006); the legal definition does not refer to intentional actions to destroy people’s cultures despite Lemkin’s position that genocide includes the dissolution of political, social, cultural, economic, biological, physical, religious and moral dimensions of communities (Lemkin, 1944). Lemkin’s original conceptualization far surpassed the notion of physical annihilation to include the targeting and destruction of “social” groups.…”
Section: Genocide: Considerations and Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the conceptual consistency of genocide, some scholars argue that the definition in the GC lacks details about the appropriate interpretation of each element of the crime of genocide, including a significant absence of how to interpret or understand the notions of “intent” or “destruction” (O’Brien, 2020; Özsu, 2020). Additionally, scholars have denounced how the legal definition diminished Raphael Lemkin’s initial concept (Özsu, 2020; Jacobs, 2018; Jones, 2006); the legal definition does not refer to intentional actions to destroy people’s cultures despite Lemkin’s position that genocide includes the dissolution of political, social, cultural, economic, biological, physical, religious and moral dimensions of communities (Lemkin, 1944). Lemkin’s original conceptualization far surpassed the notion of physical annihilation to include the targeting and destruction of “social” groups.…”
Section: Genocide: Considerations and Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The political implications of using the term and interpretation of genocide are then overlooked for normative concerns. Today, the debates around using the "G" word antagonize a state's decision to intervene to prevent genocides (Jacobs, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%