1959
DOI: 10.1021/j150581a051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition of the Differential Reaction Rate in Ammonia Synthesis kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
86
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the symmetry and angular momentum, the chiral p-wave vortex core with L z = 0 can be identified with the s-wave superconductors in the absence of the magnetic field. For the latter, non-magnetic impurities are known to be harmless (the Anderson theorem 43) ). These two explain why non-magnetic impurities are harmless in the chiral p-wave vortex with L z = 0.…”
Section: Modification Due To Finite κmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the symmetry and angular momentum, the chiral p-wave vortex core with L z = 0 can be identified with the s-wave superconductors in the absence of the magnetic field. For the latter, non-magnetic impurities are known to be harmless (the Anderson theorem 43) ). These two explain why non-magnetic impurities are harmless in the chiral p-wave vortex with L z = 0.…”
Section: Modification Due To Finite κmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect, which is ascribed to the Anderson theorem [1], limits the influence of long-range phase coherence phenomena to situations in which lowenergy quasi-particles persist: notably, the physics of hybrid SN-compounds, and those which exhibit unconventional (e.g. d-wave) symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suppression of NMR coherence peak may be attributed to (a) gap anisotropy [5]/non s-wave pairing of superconducting phase [6,7], (b) strong coupling damping [8][9][10], (c) paramagnetic impurities in samples [5,11], and/or (d) strong Coulomb interaction such as paramagnon/antiparamagnon effects [12,13]. The non-magnetic impurity scatterings, on the other hand, have no influence on (T 1 T ) −1 [11,14,15], other than the smearing of gap anisotropy. This is because (a) there exists a simple scaling relation between the renormalization function of pure (Z(ω)) and impure ( Z(ω)) superconductors and (b) in the expression for (T 1 T ) −1 , the numerator and denominator are of the same powers in Z(ω), as will be discussed in more detail later.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need to carry out the summation over the Matsubara frequency ip and the momentum q in Eq. (15), and then take analytic continuation and the limit ω → 0 as given in Eq. (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%