1990
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.3.2117365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition of terms used to judge the efficacy of diagnostic tests: a graphic approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To supplement previously published introductory material (2)(3)(4), I will relate the nine fundamental principles to the specific clinical scenario just described to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of using them for clinical decision making and clinical research. I plan to answer the following questions in the course of this discussion: Which descriptors of an examination are the best intrinsic measures of performance?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To supplement previously published introductory material (2)(3)(4), I will relate the nine fundamental principles to the specific clinical scenario just described to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of using them for clinical decision making and clinical research. I plan to answer the following questions in the course of this discussion: Which descriptors of an examination are the best intrinsic measures of performance?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither spiculation nor pneumatosis was recognized on any plain abdominal radiograph in this series of children. The intestinal cut-off sign had a sensitivity of 73 % and specificity of 76 % [6]. It was seen in 40 of the 55 episodes of enterocolitis (73 %), and in 21 of the other 86 (24 %) abdominal series (including 2 children with small bowel obstruction from adhesions, 1 with severe constipation, and 18 surveillance studies).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Efficacy is typically quantified by standard measures such as sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. 11,13 Alternatively, the clinical effectiveness of an imaging examination describes the utility of a diagnostic examination in guiding treatment decisions that affect patient outcomes. Clinical effectiveness can be assessed by comparing outcomes between groups of patients who were treated based on the findings of the different diagnostic examinations.…”
Section: Diagnostic Efficacy Vs Clinical Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%