2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition of Success after Surgery for Female Stress Incontinence or Voiding Dysfunction: An Attempt at Standardization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a questionnaire was combined with the number of pads per day, the rate was reduced to 35%. Standardization of the definition of success for ACT balloon implantations would certainly improve the assessment of its efficacy [29]. The discrepancies observed could also be explained by the lack of standardization of the surgical procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a questionnaire was combined with the number of pads per day, the rate was reduced to 35%. Standardization of the definition of success for ACT balloon implantations would certainly improve the assessment of its efficacy [29]. The discrepancies observed could also be explained by the lack of standardization of the surgical procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cough stress test may be too difficult to standardise for use in RCTs. In a review by Carmel et al , there was different cough stress test standardisation in all the 56 studies that used the cough stress test as a measure of success for surgical interventions for SUI. Similarly, the pad test is difficult to standardise and has different variation such as the 20‐min, 1‐h or 24‐h pad test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have acknowledged this quandary over recent decades, 46,47 and there have been numerous attempts to unite researchers in the field to establish minimum standards regarding the instruments utilized to measure the results of our interventions and to determine how a favorable outcome should be defined. 48,49…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have acknowledged this quandary over recent decades, 46,47 and there have been numerous attempts to unite researchers in the field to establish minimum standards regarding the instruments utilized to measure the results of our interventions and to determine how a favorable outcome should be defined. 48,49 While technology continues to evolve and new innovative techniques emerge, accurate assessment of outcomes following medical intervention is paramount to optimizing one's ability to offer the best treatments for our patients. Only when a consensus around outcomes assessment is reached will it be possible to accomplish meaningful comparison of outcomes from 1 center to another, foster collaborative learning from 1 another, and truly advance the field.…”
Section: Standardization Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%