2011
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31821fd208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition of Intertwin Birth Weight Discordance

Abstract: : The threshold for birth weight discordance established by this prospective study is 18% both for dichorionic twin pairs and for monochorionic twins without twin-twin transfusion syndrome. This threshold is considerably lower than that defined by many retrospective series as pathologic. We suggest that an anticipated difference of 18% in birth weight should prompt more intensive fetal monitoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
130
2
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
130
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition because dizygotic twins are genetically distinct individuals, it is not surprising that they might be programmed to have very different weights at birth. In this regard discordance up to 10 percent can be considered normal [2]. With increasing discordance (>18%) the risk of adverse perinatal outcome remains increased within a growth-discordant pair even where both twins were appropriate for gestational age [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition because dizygotic twins are genetically distinct individuals, it is not surprising that they might be programmed to have very different weights at birth. In this regard discordance up to 10 percent can be considered normal [2]. With increasing discordance (>18%) the risk of adverse perinatal outcome remains increased within a growth-discordant pair even where both twins were appropriate for gestational age [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard discordance up to 10 percent can be considered normal [2]. With increasing discordance (>18%) the risk of adverse perinatal outcome remains increased within a growth-discordant pair even where both twins were appropriate for gestational age [2]. Weather discordant pairs where one or both of the foetuses were large for gestational ages are at risk of adverse effect is not known, as this is rare occurrence in twins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a large, multicenter, prospective study (ESPRiT) [3] the cut-off value of the EFW discordance above which, the risk for poor perinatal outcomes becomes 2-fold more than the risk in singleton pregnancies, stands at 18% for both dichorionic twins and monochorionic twins without cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. However, the same study reaches the conclusion that discordant monochorionic twins face higher absolute morbidity risks in comparison with discordant dichorionic twins at all stages of birth weight discordance [3].…”
Section: Estimated Fetal Weight Discordance and Perinatal Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, monochorionic twin pregnancies are complicated by such discordances twice as often as dichorionic ones. Higher degrees of growth discordance are accompanied by higher rates of perinatal mortality and morbidity both in the smaller and in the larger twin [3][4][5]. The current review serves to explore the importance of inter-twin estimated fetal weight (EFW) and crown rump length (CRL) discordance for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%