Monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Sourse Location 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8250-7_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition of Exclusion Zones Using Seismic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the seismic stations located within the DSR displayed lower Q c values than stations situated on the Western flank, it demonstrates that at short epicentral distances, wave paths confined exclusively to the sedimentary basin have a higher scattering than wave paths that comprise a section along the material interface of the boundary fault zones and within solid bedrock. Similarly, Bartal et al (2000) noted that a weak event (M 2.7) located North of the Dead Sea, reached a tripartite microarray, located out of the DSR at an epicentral distance of 81.5 km, faster than predicted if it had followed the shortest path. In both cases, seismic loads or at least some part of them see their propagation efficiency enhanced, guided by the DSR substructure, they arrive faster at the target than anticipated and with signal amplitude higher than expected.…”
Section: Path Effectmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since the seismic stations located within the DSR displayed lower Q c values than stations situated on the Western flank, it demonstrates that at short epicentral distances, wave paths confined exclusively to the sedimentary basin have a higher scattering than wave paths that comprise a section along the material interface of the boundary fault zones and within solid bedrock. Similarly, Bartal et al (2000) noted that a weak event (M 2.7) located North of the Dead Sea, reached a tripartite microarray, located out of the DSR at an epicentral distance of 81.5 km, faster than predicted if it had followed the shortest path. In both cases, seismic loads or at least some part of them see their propagation efficiency enhanced, guided by the DSR substructure, they arrive faster at the target than anticipated and with signal amplitude higher than expected.…”
Section: Path Effectmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At a regional scale, S n and P g waves are reported to be filtered in the vicinity of the DSR (Rodgers et al, 1997). At a local scale, a monitoring array deployed in the Negev (Bartal et al, 2000), received microseisms located in the DSR faster than expected based on predictions using a direct path. These observations confirm previous coda wave studies showing a discrepancy between the DSR and the flank of the rift (van Eck, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations