1985
DOI: 10.3109/17453678508993037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition of endoprosthetic loosening: Comparison of arthrography, scintigraphy and roentgen stereophotogrammetry in prosthetic hips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cemented stems, this was suggested by Mjoberg et 01. [12], and confirmed by Karrholm etal. [13], using highly accurate roentgen stereophorogrammerric analysis (RSA).…”
Section: Fixation and Interface Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For cemented stems, this was suggested by Mjoberg et 01. [12], and confirmed by Karrholm etal. [13], using highly accurate roentgen stereophorogrammerric analysis (RSA).…”
Section: Fixation and Interface Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A method of predicting implant performance as soon as possible after implantation is needed, and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) has this potential. It has been shown for some types of implant that RSA can detect abnormalities before there are clinical or radiological signs of loosening (Green et al 1983;Mjöberg, Hansson and Selvik 1984b;Chafetz et al 1984;Nistor et al 1991;Kärrholm and Snorrason 1993), and that there is a good correlation between increased migration and early loosening (Mjöberg et al 1985;Snorrason and Kärrholm 1990;Franzén, Mjöberg and Ö nnerfält 1992;Kärrholm and Snorrason 1993;Freeman and PlanteBordeneuve 1994). There is little information from RSA studies, however, about the rate or pattern of migration which predicts early loosening of the cemented femoral components (Kärrholm et al 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early changes at the bone-cement interface cannot be demonstrated by the currently employed, noninvasive investigations; the diagnosis of loosening is based on the detection of bone resorption around the implant by standard roentgenography or arthrography; other signs include migration of the prosthetic components or instability, which can be demonstrated by more sophisticated methods as such roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis [10,11]. However on the basis of pathological changes at the bone-cement interface observed in this study, the process leading to loosening is far advanced when instability occurs, or before periprosthetic bone resorption may be detected on radiograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%