2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition, Incidence, and Challenges for Assessment of Hyperprogressive Disease During Cancer Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Abstract: Key Points Question What are the definition, incidence, and challenges associated with the current assessment of hyperprogressive disease among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer? Findings In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 studies including 3109 patients, the definition of hyperprogressive disease varied across studies and was divided into 4 categories: tumor growth rate ratio, tumor growth kinetics ratio, earl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the nivolumab often had a slow onset of efficacy in realworld practice, and the hyperprogressions made patients had little opportunity to receive the third or fourth line of therapies because of bad general conditions. The hyperprogression has an incidence of 6-43% in ICIs monotherapy and has not been reported in combination therapy of ICIs and chemotherapy [26]. The attempts to combine the nivolumab and chemotherapy in second-line therapy in NSCLC patients are clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the nivolumab often had a slow onset of efficacy in realworld practice, and the hyperprogressions made patients had little opportunity to receive the third or fourth line of therapies because of bad general conditions. The hyperprogression has an incidence of 6-43% in ICIs monotherapy and has not been reported in combination therapy of ICIs and chemotherapy [26]. The attempts to combine the nivolumab and chemotherapy in second-line therapy in NSCLC patients are clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this should be partially accounted for by a multivariable adjustment in some studies, it was not possible to separate out a pure effect of diabetes from the published studies as no stratified data or analyses were presented. Fourth, publication bias was present in pooling the HR, probably owing to small-study effects [34]. Also, we could not exclude the risk of publication bias against studies reporting negative findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog status is significantly correlated with HPD in colon cancer patients. Two large-scale meta-analyses reported the incidence of HPD in patients with pan-cancer as 1%-30% [21] and 5.9%-43.1% [22] . The clinical prognostic markers used in these analyses were similar to those reported by Chen et al [20] .…”
Section: Incidence and Prognostic Indicators Of Hpdmentioning
confidence: 99%