2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40519-018-0606-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa: a narrative review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
280
3
19

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(321 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
6
280
3
19
Order By: Relevance
“…As already stated, an assessment based on self-administered questionnaires entails problems in terms of realibility and possible underestimation/overestimation. The ORTO-15 Questionnaire does not allow to make a diagnosis of ON, and has intrinsic limitations already described by the scientific literature [59], with contradictory results regarding its psychometric properties, including construct validity [9,[60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already stated, an assessment based on self-administered questionnaires entails problems in terms of realibility and possible underestimation/overestimation. The ORTO-15 Questionnaire does not allow to make a diagnosis of ON, and has intrinsic limitations already described by the scientific literature [59], with contradictory results regarding its psychometric properties, including construct validity [9,[60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in some cases, interest in healthy food consumption and health could lead to orthorexia nervosa-an obsessional focus on a diet considered to be healthy, focusing on concerns regarding the quality of food, with overly care for one's health [4]. This unhealthy eating pattern is associated with excessive time spent preparing food, inflexible dietary rules, recurrent and persistent preoccupations related to "pure" or "clean" food, rigid avoidance of foods considered "unhealthy", compulsive behaviors, distress at violation of food rules, as well as consequent, clinically significant, impairment (e.g., medical or psychological complications, social isolation, and/or impairment in important areas of functioning) [5][6][7]. Recently, the bidimensional nature of orthorexia nervosa was proposed: with one dimension related to healthy interest in diet and healthy behavior with regard to diet (a protective factor against emotional distress) named healthy orthorexia (HeOr) and another dimension related to a pathological preoccupation with Nutrients 2020, 12, 646 2 of 14 eating healthily (a new variant of disordered eating related to negative affect) named orthorexia nervosa (OrNe) [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misunderstanding can lead to overanalysis of food intake and a fixation on righteous eating or orthorexia nervosa, a condition in which a patient will avoid food that they believe to be harmful. 39 Commonly, patients will present with extended self-initiated food and symptom diaries and limit their social activities around food. Concern about reintroducing or testing the impact of food is also common among these people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%