2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining unrecognized myocardial infarction: A call for standardized electrocardiographic diagnostic criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, MC was coded by visual reading in our study. Computerized ECG analysis is reportedly superior to visual reading for better reliability 28) ; however, ECG reading in this study was performed under the best standardized quality control in 1980. Third, we could not assess the risk of q wave abnormalities according to the lead in which q waves were present to evaluate their clinical meaning because there were no data concerning the lead in the baseline survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, MC was coded by visual reading in our study. Computerized ECG analysis is reportedly superior to visual reading for better reliability 28) ; however, ECG reading in this study was performed under the best standardized quality control in 1980. Third, we could not assess the risk of q wave abnormalities according to the lead in which q waves were present to evaluate their clinical meaning because there were no data concerning the lead in the baseline survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 In addition, previous studies suggest that the long-term cardiovascular prognosis of individuals with silent MI may be similar to that of subjects with recognized MI. 39 -43 Individuals with ECG Q waves, the most commonly used method to detect unrecognized MIs, 44 have been excluded from the present analysis, but this would not rule out all silent MIs, because imaging studies have greater sensitivity for detecting transmural or partial-thickness scar than do ECG Q waves. 45,46 Detection of segmental LV WM abnormality improved risk stratification even after adjustment for the effect of low LV ejection fraction in the present analyses.…”
Section: Wm Abnormalities and Prediction Of Cardiovascular Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in the Table, these results have been confirmed by reports from other investigators in locations ranging from Honolulu and Reykjavik to Israel and the Bronx, with UMI prevalence rates largely related to age and ranging from approximately 4% to 44% of all infarctions. 3,4 Remarkably, with the exception of the Israeli Ischemic Heart Disease Study, all-cause death rates were similar in recognized MI and UMI in all of these reports.…”
Section: Unrecognized Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 68%