2010
DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2010.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the Word "Seamount"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the term ‘seamount’ has been defined inconsistently in various studies due to the specific interests in a field of research or limitations of the data used in a study (Menard 1964; Jordan et al 1983; White et al 1983; Wessel & Lyons 1997; Wessel et al 2010). A recent attempt to include diverse views on seamounts within multidisciplinary research communities describes seamounts as ‘any geographically isolated topographic features on the seafloor taller than 100 m, including ones whose summit regions may temporarily emerge above sea level, but not including features that are located on continental shelves or that are part of other major landmasses’ (Staudigel et al 2010). The automatic tagging within the SEZs, the manual tagging of volcanic ridges, and the height threshold make our potential seamount count more compatible with modern terminology than those of previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the term ‘seamount’ has been defined inconsistently in various studies due to the specific interests in a field of research or limitations of the data used in a study (Menard 1964; Jordan et al 1983; White et al 1983; Wessel & Lyons 1997; Wessel et al 2010). A recent attempt to include diverse views on seamounts within multidisciplinary research communities describes seamounts as ‘any geographically isolated topographic features on the seafloor taller than 100 m, including ones whose summit regions may temporarily emerge above sea level, but not including features that are located on continental shelves or that are part of other major landmasses’ (Staudigel et al 2010). The automatic tagging within the SEZs, the manual tagging of volcanic ridges, and the height threshold make our potential seamount count more compatible with modern terminology than those of previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the term ‘bank’ is used to indicate generically submarine reliefs, such as shallows, ridges, knolls and pinnacles, including the definition of seamounts, submarine elevations of volcanic origin defined by Staudigel et al [25] as: “any geographically isolated topographic feature on the seafloor taller than 100 m, including ones whose summit regions may temporarily emerge above sea level, but not including features that are located on continental shelves or that are part of other major landmasses”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt here a broad definition of a seamount as any geographically isolated topographic feature on the seafloor taller than 100 m including ones whose summit regions may temporarily emerge above sea level (Staudigel et al, 2010b). In this definition, seamounts may form in any plate tectonic setting, they may currently be buried beneath sediments on the seafloor, or they may now be exposed on land by tectonic and erosion processes.…”
Section: Definition Of the Term Seamountmentioning
confidence: 99%