2016
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the Value of a Comparative Approach to Cancer Drug Development

Abstract: Comparative oncology as a tool in drug development requires a deeper examination of the value of the approach and examples of where this approach can satisfy unmet needs. This review seeks to demonstrate types of drug development questions that are best answered by the comparative oncology approach. We believe common perceived risks of the comparative approach relate to uncertainty of how regulatory bodies will prioritize or react to data generated from these unique studies conducted in diseased animals, and h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of this conference has recently been reported (51). These offer unique opportunities for drug and chemo-radiotherapy development (52). Canine tumors are genetically diverse, grow relatively slowly, exhibit spatio-temporal heterogeneity and diversity, are amenable to imaging studies, and can help assess cost-effective treatment choices (53).…”
Section: Focus Areas: Preclinical Radiobiological Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of this conference has recently been reported (51). These offer unique opportunities for drug and chemo-radiotherapy development (52). Canine tumors are genetically diverse, grow relatively slowly, exhibit spatio-temporal heterogeneity and diversity, are amenable to imaging studies, and can help assess cost-effective treatment choices (53).…”
Section: Focus Areas: Preclinical Radiobiological Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Consortium's overarching mission is to improve the quality and forward progress of brain tumor research by leveraging the study of spontaneous brain tumors in pet dogs, and is an extension of the National Cancer Institute's Comparative Oncology Program, which has led the field of comparative oncology research for over a decade. There is substantial evidence that the study of naturally occurring cancers in dogs can meaningfully contribute to many fields of cancer research, including neurooncology, as tumor‐bearing pet dogs are a disease model that complements knowledge gained in mouse models and through human clinical research . Within the Comparative Brain Tumor Consortium, five distinct working groups were formed to facilitate cross‐discipline communications and generate new knowledge in the following areas: tumor biology, clinical trials, drug development, pathology and molecular markers, and patient outcomes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many advantages of such a model and the most important of them include the following: (a) spontaneous occurrence of tumors in immunocompetent individuals; (b) naturally developing treatment resistance of the cancer cells; (c) spontaneous recurrence and metastasis; (d) possibility of canine patients monitoring for hematologic and biochemical toxicity via routine clinical pathology, and sophisticated monitoring like in human medicine; (e) ability to notice the impact of supportive care (e.g., antiemetics, antidiarrheals, antibiotics, etc.) on the course of a therapy; (f) occurrence of heterogeneity within the cancer [7]. All of the above advantages encourage scientists to design research involving dogs and the results obtained this way become a valuable source of medical information.…”
Section: Comparative Oncology-canine Models In Cancer Biology and Thementioning
confidence: 99%