2002
DOI: 10.1353/earl.2002.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the Sortes Sanctorum : Gibbon, Du Cange, and Early Christian Lot Divination

Abstract: First mentioned in a fifth-century Gallic church council, the term sortes sanctorum ("lots of the saints") recurs throughout the Latin middle ages. Following Charles Du Cange's Glossarium . . . Latinitatis (1678), scholars have usually defined it either as a synonym for divinatory consultation of the Bible (sortes biblicae) or as a blanket label for all early Christian lot divination. This article argues instead that Sortes Sanctorum was the title of a divinatory text found in numerous manuscripts (in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the Sikh perspective, however, the random choosing of the passage functions to remove the sinful ego ( haumai ) from the process so as to allow the True Guru to do the choosing. There is a parallel phenomenon in classical Hellenism (picking out texts from the Iliad and Odyssey for divination purposes) and early Christianity (picking out phrases from the Bible), complete with guides to what a random choosing means, but these were always condemned by the religious authorities, not folded into official ritual (Klingshirn 2002). In the Sikh case, however, the Vak ritual is a well‐established tradition.…”
Section: Reception Of the Scripture As Gurumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Sikh perspective, however, the random choosing of the passage functions to remove the sinful ego ( haumai ) from the process so as to allow the True Guru to do the choosing. There is a parallel phenomenon in classical Hellenism (picking out texts from the Iliad and Odyssey for divination purposes) and early Christianity (picking out phrases from the Bible), complete with guides to what a random choosing means, but these were always condemned by the religious authorities, not folded into official ritual (Klingshirn 2002). In the Sikh case, however, the Vak ritual is a well‐established tradition.…”
Section: Reception Of the Scripture As Gurumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still useful FLÜGEL 1860 for Muslim lot-oracles. See also KLINGSHIRN 2002;KLINGSHIRN 2005. 6 See HEINEVETTER 1912SCHWENDNER 2002, 109;GRAF 2005, 55-59;MEERSON 2019, 139, 141. For the variety of decisions taken by using lots, see VAN DER HORST 1998, 143. 7 See KLINGSHIRN 2019, 72-73 for the list of lots-oracles practiced in a large number of oracles, as Iamblichus´ Hypomnesticon mentions with respect to little pebbles and stones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klingshirn 2002, 85-86. 131 McNeill 1933 Et qui per scripturas sanctas Deum, quid ei facturus sit, expectatur, quid ipsas indicent scripturas… iste non christianus, sed paganus est (text fromKlingshirn 2002, 105).…”
unclassified