2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the relative performance of isothermal assays that can be used for rapid and sensitive detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Abstract: HighlightsIsothermal assays representative of RT-LAMP and RT-RPA were compared against rRT-PCR.Nine sample preparation methods were evaluated across all assays.RT-LAMP can detect FMDV in multiple sample types using simple preparation techniques.RT-LAMP can detect FMDV across a large diagnostic detection window.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With further field validation, the results from two3 could potentially be accepted with the same level of confidence as the reference lab‐based platforms, especially for oral and nasal swabs and specifically vesicular flu acquired during the acute phase of infection. Similar results have been reported for FMDV on other field‐deployable real‐time molecular assays/platforms (Howson et al, ; Howson, Armson, et al, ; Howson, Kurosaki, et al, ; Moniwa et al, ). The fact that two3 detected FMDV in the absence of RNA extraction further potentiates its utility for onsite testing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With further field validation, the results from two3 could potentially be accepted with the same level of confidence as the reference lab‐based platforms, especially for oral and nasal swabs and specifically vesicular flu acquired during the acute phase of infection. Similar results have been reported for FMDV on other field‐deployable real‐time molecular assays/platforms (Howson et al, ; Howson, Armson, et al, ; Howson, Kurosaki, et al, ; Moniwa et al, ). The fact that two3 detected FMDV in the absence of RNA extraction further potentiates its utility for onsite testing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Some of the field‐deployable molecular assays for FMD have been proven field ready (Howson et al, ; Howson, Armson, et al, ; Howson, Kurosaki, et al, ). However, two3 being a handheld, smart phone‐operated device, it is very easy to transport and does both real‐time PCR and isothermal molecular detection of nucleic acids with run programming that is customizable by the end‐user, providing results within 30–60 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S7). RT-RPA also exhibits nonspecific amplification [66][67][68] , and therefore, alternative isothermal amplification technologies, such as RT-LAMP 41,69 , could be implemented to improve specificity. Although RT-LAMP is likely to improve specificity as well as sensitivity, the requirement of two separate reactions remains problematic, increasing the likelihood of contamination due to sample transfers 70 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described earlier, as an isothermal DNA amplification method, RPA has been widely used in the detection of different pathogens. The newly established FMDV RT-RPA-LFD assay has a higher sensitivity, up to 10 copies as compared with the previous FMDV RT-RPA assays (14,40) with sensitivity limited to 100 RNA copies. Furthermore, this RT-RPA-LFD assay only requires a thermos metal bath at 38 • C unlike other previous RT-RPA assays, which need a sophisticated instrumentation, and the RPA amplicons can be detected by LFD within 5 min.…”
Section: Chromatographic Strip Testsmentioning
confidence: 95%