“…In line with literature reports, the present study confirms the well-known frequent genetic defect of HA and HB, where the null allele (large deletion, insertion/deletion mutations, nonsense, and gene rearrangements principally inversion of intron 22) was responsible for the most frequent genetic abnormalities in severe HA (10 out of 26 severe forms, 38.4%), whereas missense mutations have been found in the majority of patients with moderate (3 out of 5, 60%) and mild forms of the disease (5 out of 7, 71.4%) and comprise the most frequent molecular defect in HB (>50% of all reported mutations) (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2, online version). 7,17,19,20,22,23 Our study also in agreement with previously published data 3,24 found that the risk of developing inhibitors was much less frequent in HB patients compared to HA (5.1% vs 25%, respectively), and the risk was allied mostly in severely affected patients except for 2 mild HA cases (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2, online version), thus supporting the assumption that the higher prevalence of the less severe missense mutations in HB compared to HA provides a potential biological reason for explaining the milder disease phenotype regarding bleeding severity and inhibitor risk in HB versus HA. 3 It is well known that the risk for inhibitor development to factor replacement therapy is related to several factors including the type and location of genetic defect, where variants with gross defects, such as Out of all cases, 1 case was positive for the factor inhibitors.…”