2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl082119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the Limits of Greater India

Abstract: Greater India comprises a part of the Indian plate that subducted under Asia to help form the Tibetan Plateau. Defining the size of the Greater India is thus a key constraint to model the India‐Asia collision, growth of the plateau, and the tectonic evolution of the Neo‐Tethyan realm. We report Early Cretaceous paleomagnetic data from the central and eastern Tethyan Himalaya that yield paleolatitudes consistent with previous Early Cretaceous paleogeographic reconstructions. These data suggest Greater India ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coincidentally, it has been demonstrated that other sites in the TP, including regions in the south (DeCelles et al, 2014;Yi et al, 2011), centre (Horton et al, 2002;Li et al, 2012), north (Jin et al, 2018;Staisch et al, 2016), northwest (Cao et al, 2013(Cao et al, , 2015, east (Tian et al, 2016) and southeast (Liu-Zeng et al, 2018), deformed in the early Cenozoic. The Indian Plate has pushed into the Asian Plate more than 2,500 km since the plate collision in the early Cenozoic (Meng et al, 2019;Molnar & Stock, 2009), and the Paleogene convergence rate between India and Asia was clearly faster than that in the Neogene (Molnar & Stock, 2009). Recent paleoelevation studies suggest that the southern and central plateau was low until the Neogene (Botsyun et al, 2019;Ding et al, 2017;Su et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Implications For the Growth Of The Tpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coincidentally, it has been demonstrated that other sites in the TP, including regions in the south (DeCelles et al, 2014;Yi et al, 2011), centre (Horton et al, 2002;Li et al, 2012), north (Jin et al, 2018;Staisch et al, 2016), northwest (Cao et al, 2013(Cao et al, , 2015, east (Tian et al, 2016) and southeast (Liu-Zeng et al, 2018), deformed in the early Cenozoic. The Indian Plate has pushed into the Asian Plate more than 2,500 km since the plate collision in the early Cenozoic (Meng et al, 2019;Molnar & Stock, 2009), and the Paleogene convergence rate between India and Asia was clearly faster than that in the Neogene (Molnar & Stock, 2009). Recent paleoelevation studies suggest that the southern and central plateau was low until the Neogene (Botsyun et al, 2019;Ding et al, 2017;Su et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Implications For the Growth Of The Tpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if there is no subduction of felsic crust, the UCC/MCC crustal volume of GIC must balance the net volume of UCC/MCC in the present Himalaya and that being eroded. However, the final results (Extended Data Table 2) reveal the missing GIC felsic crust of 1.36×10 km 3 to 5.04×10 7 km , or ~20% to 47% of the pre-collisional UCC/MCC, based on different reconstructions of GIC 1,6,7,8,9 . It is worth noting that the estimate is just the lower limit of mass deficit due to overestimate of the UCC/MCC thickness in the present Himalaya.…”
Section: Mass Imbalance In the Felsic Crust Of Greater Indian Continent (Gic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the extent of GIC from reconstructions varies greatly from ~900 km to ~2600 km (Extended Data Table 1). Using the relatively well-constrained precollisional data of Greater India 1,6,7,8,9 and the global average UCC and MCC crustal thickness of 23 km 10 , we derive the volume of Greater Indian felsic crust, ranging from 7.13±0.69×10 7 km 3 to 10.81±1.15×10 7 km 3 (Extended Data Table 2). After collision, the Greater India-derived continental felsic crust is mainly preserved in the Himalaya fold-thrust belt 11 .…”
Section: Mass Imbalance In the Felsic Crust Of Greater Indian Continent (Gic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the paleolatitudinal comparison based on reliable This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article paleomagnetic poles, paleomagnetism provides a direct constrain on timing and locus for the initial collision between India and Asia (e.g., Dupont-Nivet et al, 2010;Najman et al, 2010;Yi et al, 2011Yi et al, , 2021 The Indian plate was subjected to rapid northward motion toward Asia during the Cretaceous and Paleocene (Patriat and Achache, 1984;Yin and Harrison, 2000;van Hinsbergen et al, 2011). The kinematics of the northern margin of India can be constrained by the Cretaceous and Paleogene paleomagnetic data obtained from the Tethyan Himalaya (Besse et al, 1984;Patzelt et al, 1996;Tong et al, 2008;Yi et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2015Yang et al, , 2019Ma et al, 2016;Meng et al, 2019Meng et al, , 2020Y. Zhang et al, 2019;Yuan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%